Monday, December 28, 2015

Yale's Omission of Fact---to take millions from terror financiers

An omission of fact is a purposeful misrepresentation of fact. In a court of law, district attorneys can be severely disciplined for allowing such to happen especially when the results are the successful prosecution of an innocent person. Defense attorneys also have to be careful that they too do not fall under this ominous ethical charge.

The federal government has regulations regarding the concept of omission of fact, much of it is found in U.S. Code: Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE. Keep this topic in mind as the concept of foreign relations is foremost in this topic!

In September, Yale University’s president Peter Salovey presented to the public that it was a recipient of $10,000,000 from Abdallah S. Kamel of the Dallah Albaraka (aka Al Baraka) Group in Saudi Arabia for the establishing of an Islamic Law Center in the Law School at Yale which shall bare the name: Abdallah S. Kamel Islamic Law Center. According to Mr. Salovey this center exists for the purpose of disseminating “knowledge and insights for the benefit of scholars and leaders all over the world.” This makes the center within the Law School at Yale an educational entity where classes and research will occur, and for the purpose of this commentary shall hereafter be refered to as a “Sharia School.”

Mr. Salovey’s announcement of Yale’s acceptance of these funds did not inform the public that Abdallah Kamel of several important points.  The first of Mr. Salovey’s omissions of fact regarding the “gift” of $10,000,000 being that these funds come directly from a person who has relationships with terrorists and/or terror financing and that this information is publically available to anyone!

Omission 1: Several articles have been written about the father of Abdallah (aka Abdullah) Saleh Kamel, being the real donor of the funds. Saleh Abdallah (aka Abdullah) Kamel of the Dallah Albaraka Group was listed on the Golden Chain financers of Al Qaeda. A lawsuit brought by the families of the victims of 9/11 named those on the Golden Chain as defendents. Saleh Kamel was released from the suit due to his living outside the personal jurisdiction of the federal court. Information was presented in the case that directly tied his company Dallah Albaraka Group to funding one of the terrorists on the planes before the attack.

Omission 2: Abdallah S. Kamel as chief executive of the Dallah Albaraka Group also bears responsibility for its financing of another federally identified terrorist group, Hamas. According to a report filed with the President of the United Nations Security Council in December 2002:

al Aqsa International Bank, was described as the “financial branch of Hamas” by American  authorities. … The bank was established with $20 million in capital by several prominent financial groups or institutions, notably the Jordan Islamic Bank and the Saudi Dallah al Baraka. The Jordan Islamic Bank is the property of the Dallah al Baraka Group, led by Saleh Abdallah Kamel, shareholder of the same bank Usama bin Laden funded in Sudan via local trustees and companies.

These two omissions of fact enable it to seem legal that Yale is working with good people for the establishing of a Shariah School at Yale. However, it is difficult to hide relationships with those who finance the outright slaughter of thousands.

Yale took down its public relations page on the Abdallah S. Kamel Islamic Law Center when this article was first proposed and the editor of the Connecticut Law tribune stated he would publish it.  That site was taken down after this writer was informed of the acceptance of this article. Interestingly Yale had one more page not available to Google which states that Yale has been in a relationship with Abdallah S. Kamel for years as they have funded lecture series on Islamic law at Yale. Really? Yale University officials never read the Wall Street Journal which wrote articles about Saleh Kamel and the Golden Chain? Yale officials never heard of the Holy Land Foundation trial which was this nation’s largest terror financing trial ever!? Worse yet, Yale officials accepting funds from Kamel had never questioned any of his banks interactions with terrorists that were noted by our Senate Banking Committee!

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

When NONE - DARE to Call it TREASON!

When NONE - DARE to Call it TREASON!

The legal code on treason is very simple.
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
With the clear and rational definition of treason being: a) adhering to the enemy and/or, b) giving them aide and comfort, it is not difficult to see if a person is guilty of this charge.

Persons who work in the field of counter-terrorism are aware of groups such as Hamas,being an FTO, Foreign Terrorist Organization. In addition, as part of their job have to be watchful for Hamas sympathizers here in the USA. In 2007 and 2008 the largest trial on terror financing in American history took place. Holy Land Foundation Relief and Development sent Hamas $12 million over its existence. The HLF’s officers were jailed for money laundering and rendering assistance to a terrorist entity.

The Hamas Charter states it is a chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood. Osama bin Laden was also a member of the Muslim Brotherhood until he left this earth.

Any President appointing persons who he know have had relations with Hamas or Al Qaeda to high places of national security would then be guilty of treason. The key here is the word “knowingly.” Now there are safe guards in place to prevent such breeches of national security. The senate approval process is one such safe guard. However, when a president skips the process of senate approval of appointees to place an enemy of the USA in a position of national security, his act of treason places the entire USA at risk of imminent attack.

Robert Malley was appointed to be the President’s Czar in the fight against ISIS on December 1, 2015. Barak Hussein Obama, the presidential candidate on 2008 fired Robert Malley for his exposed relationship with the leadership of Hamas. This means the Barak Hussein Obama was aware of a connection Robert Malley possessed to the FTO Hamas.  Did Robert Malley go through the check process of a Senate confirmation hearing? No.

Robert Malley has a history of ties to the Muslim community and possibly the Muslim Brotherhood through his father, Simon Malley, whom NBC described as “a well-known journalist born in Egypt who had ties to the Egyptian government.”  Simon Malley was noted for his anti-colonialist views and his friendliness towards the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). .

Malley’s pro-Islamist views first became known to the public in 1996 when he wrote The Call from Algeria : Third Worldism, Revolution, and the Turn to Islam. The next time they became public was in 2001 when the major media outlet exposed his favoritism towards Yasser Arafat and the PLO for insisting Israel was at least partly to blame for the failed 2000 Camp David Accord. The press had covered the event fully and they were not buying it. They exposed his bias on a national and international level.

Malley’s pro-Islamist views were highly documented by 2007 when he became a national security advisor to then presidential candidate Barak Obama. In 2008 Robert Malley was exposed as having met with officials of Hamas. A group designated as terrorists while he served under President Bill Clinton. There was no way a national security specialist would not know the wrongness in contacting the Hamas in Israel. Public exposure of this on November 11, 2008 in YNET news led to Robert Malley being fired from Obama’s team.

Fast forward to February 18, 2014 and Barak Obama, now as POTUS appoints Robert Malley to the position of a Senior Consultant on the Persian Gulf with the National Security Council. This is important to Remember as Malley is the person then who was responsible for Obama’s policy which enabled the Islamic State to be created from ISIS!  ISIS ceased to exist in June of 2014 when the Islamic State was declared to exist. Did Malley receive anything remotely resembling a demotion for this? No. One year later he received a promotion to “Czar over the fight with ISIS.” Remember ISIS does not exist today, rather the fight is against the Islamic State. The only people promoting the name ISIS or ISIL if you ask POTUS, is the media and Obama. The purpose is to misinform the public that ISIS does not mean Islamic.

Is it treasonous to place a man with known connections and affinity to a FTO to positions of national security? Is it treasonous to promote him to a position which requires NO Senate confirmation hearing after his policy creates calamity? Will the House impeach the president for the crime of treason on this issue? Sadly, no. There is not one real man in the House of Representatives who is willing to stand up and start the process.

What does this mean? Malley will serve as Czar over the fight with ISIS until Obama is removed from office. We can expect the Islamic State to grow exponentially under Malley.

Malley is not the only Muslim working in a position of power, who is working to promote Islamism in the White House! Loretta Lynch the new Attorney General revealed she was Muslim this past week when she used personal pronouns in reference to Islam and her desire to prosecute those who cause Muslims harm in America. But are there more still? YES! Check out my previous articles on this topic in the archive.

Friday, December 4, 2015

Pastor Greg Young asks, "What is CAIR and are they terrorists?

(December 4, 2015) Some people more so than other have the ability to go beyond daring to share the truth. Pastor Greg Young of Kerrville, TX invited me to tell the truth about the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)  on his show, "Chosen Generation Today," because he believes truth is more important than political correctness.

Pastor Greg pointed out that many Americans have no clue who the family of the San Bernadino shooters sought out to hold a press conference with. In this show I point out their connections to Hamas and how the national media should be ashamed for giving Hamas in America a national platform.

The Podcast can be found on the page linked below:
1) Click on
2) Select Podcast from the top menu.
3) Select the podcast with Paul Sutliff.

Below is a work in a progress of the terror links of CAIR.

A Way to STOP the Office of Refugee Resettlement Program!

As a concerned American citizen, I have been writing about a number of topics amongst them, the purposeful mislabeling of migrants as refugees. This article earned me a little attention in that it earned my an invitation to help write legislation for the state of South Carolina to propose a moratorium on the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement Program from placing persons in their state.

My scratched out idea and the hard work of five lawyers over this past weekend led to a 3-page bill ready to be passed. Unfortunately, the state senator who had invited this assistance did not have what it takes to step up and propose this bill.

Today this bill stands ready to be adopted to any state legislature and by its simplicity and the trying times that are ever present with refugees or children of refugees attacking the US citizenry stand as examples that American politicians must step up and take action! If you want a copy of this legislation for your state please contact me and I will send it to you along with a promise to support you in any way I am able to do so.

I have to believe that there are politicians out there who think about the general welfare and safety of their people. They do exist? Don't they?

Friday, November 27, 2015

Does America have an Islamic Immigrant/Refugee Terrorist Problem?

This past week Senator Sessions released a list of recent immigrants/refugees who had engaged in terrorist actions against the United States of America. His list was far from complete. I am adding an additional 14 immigrants/refugees to his list. My list, like his, is far from complete. 

Please keep in mind that those listed here are not listed for engaging in actions that would only kill one or two. Their goals were much more devastating.

Credit for making this information available belongs to the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

(If you have others you would like to add to this list that were arrested after 9/11/2001 please do contact me with the information. I will credit your contribution and add them to this list.)

1. Ali Al-Timimi, son of Iraqi immigrants and born in the Washington, DC area. He was arrested in 2004 and convicted in 2005 of soliciting and engaging others to levy war against the United States and attempting to contribute services to the Taliban. He received a life sentence. 

2. Fawaz Damra, born in the West Bank of Israel, and trained in Islamic law (Sharia) Jordan. He moved to America in the mid 1980s and became the Iman of the al-Farooq mosque in Brooklyn, NY from 1986 to 1990, he moved to Cleveland, where he headed northeastern Ohio's largest mosque, the Islamic Center of Greater Cleveland, from 1991 to 2004. Fawaz raised funds for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad through the Islamic Committee for Palestine (ICP). He was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator implicated in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing. His phone was tapped by the FBI discussing funding suicide bombers families with Sami Al Arian, listed below. Fawaz was deported in 2007 for lying on his citizenship application

3.      Sami Al Arian, a Kuwait born immigrant, who was arrested for his leadership role in the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). He was sentenced on May 1, 2006, to 57 months in prison (which includes 38 months for time served) and agreed to be deported after serving the prison term. He was deported in the Spring of 2015. His daughter Laila is listed as a visitor to the White House.

4.      Adnan Babar Mirza, a Pakistani was on a F-1 Student Visa permitting him to enter the United States for educational purposes on August 15, 2001. The visa expired on December 12, 2005. He plead guilty to 13 counts, many related to terrorism on September 19, 2007.


5.  Mohammed Abdullah Warsame, a naturalized Canadian citizen of Somali descent, pleaded guilty to the material support of a foreign terrorist organization – al Qaeda. He was sentenced on July 8, 2009 to 92 months in prison and three years of supervised release. He is slated to be released in 2017.

6.      Najibullah Zazi was born in a village in Paktia Province, Afghanistan. His family immigrated to the US in the early 1990s. On February 22, 2010 he plead guilty to: 1) conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction (explosive bombs) against persons or property in the United States, 2) conspiracy to commit murder in a foreign country and providing material support to al-Qaeda. Among other things, Zazi admitted that he brought TATP [Triacetone Triperoxide] explosives to New York on Sept. 10, 2009, as part of plan to attack the New York subway system.

7.     Adis Medunjanin, 28, who was born in Bosnia. His family immigrated to the USA in the early 1990s. He joined al-Qaeda and plotted to commit a suicide terrorist attack, was found guilty of multiple federal terrorism offenses on May 1, 2012. Adis and his accomplices came within days of executing a plot to conduct coordinated suicide bombings in the New York City subway system in September 2009, as directed by senior al-Qaeda leaders in Pakistan.

8.      Zarein Ahmedzay (aka Omar), originally from Afghanistan, plead guilty to taking part in a” deadly plot hatched by al-Qaeda leaders overseas to kill scores of Americans in the New York City subway system in September 2009," said Attorney General Eric Holder.

9.      Ahmad Wais Afzali (aka Muhammad), an Iman who was deported from the US to Saudi Arabia on July 6, 2010. He was sentenced to deportation per his plea agreement for aiding Najibullah Zazi  by telling him that he was under surveillance by the FBI. His action was protecting a potential mass murderer.

10. Hamid Seifi, also known as HANK SEIFI is an Iranian born United States national who plead guilty of conspiracy to illegally export military components for fighter jets and attack helicopters from the United States to Iran on July 1, 2011.

11. Nima Ali Yusuf, 26, a Somalian born refugee now permanent resident of America plead guilty on November7, 2012 to two counts of providing material support and resources to al-Shabaab, a US designated terrorist group. She received a sentence of 8 years.

12. Asia Siddiqui, a 31-year-old native of Saudi Arabia.was arrested on May of 2013 for terror related incidents. According to the New York Daily News, “Siddiqui was arrested in possession of propane gas tanks and instructions on converting them into bombs. And authorities say Valentzas became obsessed with pressure cookers after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing.”

13.  Abdullahi Mohamud Yusuf, a Somalian-American former refugee, plead guilty to conspiracy to provide material support and resources to ISIS on February 26, 2015.

14. Mehrdad Yasrebi, an Iranian-American plead guilty to illegally funneling millions of dollars to Iran in violation of the U.S. trade embargo.

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Trump and Carson are Right! Some Muslims in America Support Terrorism!

Peoples Pundit Daily:

Presidential candidate Donald Trump is catching flack for saying he saw thousands of Muslims in America celebrating the attacks on 9/11 on television. Major media outlets have been quick to denounce Trump as being nothing but wrong. Today Dr. Ben Carson, another GOP contender for the position of POTUS backed Trump up. The media storm against them is relentless!
However, the major media is being far from truthful in its accusations that Trump was wrong. There are several recorded actions of Muslims in America supporting terrorism.

Muslim Students’ Association West Conference in January 2011 at UCLA, attendees recited a pledge, "Allah is my lord, Islam is my life, the Quran is my guide, the Sunna is my practice, Jihad is my spirit, righteousness is my character, paradise is my goal. I enjoin what is right, I forbid what is wrong, I will fight against oppression, and I will die to establish Islam." ( )

New York State Prison Chaplain Warith Deen Umar (aka Wallace Gene Marks) was removed from his position and barred from entering by Gov. George Pataki in 2003. CBS News reported:

Umar began his activities as a prison chaplain in 1975. New York Gov. George Pataki barred Umar from prisons in 2003, after the Wall Street Journal reported that Umar had expressed support for the 9/11 terrorists — even stating that Muslims "who say they are against terrorism secretly admire and applaud" bin Laden's mass murderers. (According to Umar, the Koran does not forbid terrorism even against the innocent. "This is the sort of teaching they don't want in prison," he said. "But this is what I'm doing.") <emphasis added>

Presidents Clinton and Bush met with Abdurahman Alamoudi as a representative of American Muslims. He led the American Muslim Council, and the Muslim American Society. In 2003, Alamoudi was arrested and charged with 18 counts of federal crimes related to supporting terrorism. He is today serving a 23 year prison sentence. The Washington Institute had this to say about the man who represented America’s Muslims to presidents.

In 2000, American Muslim Council founder and former Executive Director Abdurahman Alamoodi announced at a rally outside the White House: "We are all supporters of Hamas. Allahu Akhbar! ... I am also a supporter of Hezbollah." After the President announced the closure of the HLF, which raised $13 million for Hamas in its last year of operation, the AMC condemned the action as "particularly disturbing ... unjust and counterproductive."[12] AMC's position was predictable, given that Alamoudi attended a conference of major Islamic terrorist groups in Beirut in January 2001.

If the name Alamoudi strikes a recent cord of memory, it should. He was the founder of the Islamic Society of Boston, which the infamous Boston Bombers attended. Alamoudi had long been in jail when Boston was bombed on April 15, 2013.
Trump may seem brash, and anything but restrained in his speech. But, his words of caution and warning regarding Islamic terrorism are not wrong. Dr. Carson who backed him up is one who chooses his words carefully, perhaps this should have been a clue to the American people that the major media outlets are hiding something.

 This is only a smidgen of the available information on whether some Muslims in America endorse terrorist actions. There is a treasure trove of information out there supporting this argument. The leaders of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the leaders of the Islamic Society of North America have numerous quotes on their support of Hamas that have been exposed and in the media. Was it really too hard for major media outlets to find this information to say maybe Trump and Carson are right about this?

But  it all comes down to the words of Dick Cheney recorded by the Department of Defense in 2002:    
"We don't know if it's going to be tomorrow, or next week or next year," Cheney said. The U.S.-led war on terrorism has had some successes at disrupting the al Qaeda terrorist network, making it more difficult for them to carry out operations, he noted, but it's almost impossible to build "a 100 percent perfect defense."

“The American people must understand the reality of the enemy we're up against," he stressed. Even if your defense is 99 percent successful, that other one percent "can still kill you."
Knowing the truth of these words gives reason to ponder the purposeful misinformation being pushed out by the major news networks on this issue! Are the major news networks working against the safety of every American?

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

Thursday, November 19, 2015

When is a Refugee not a Refugee?

According to President Obama, as recorded by the New York Times, the USA is slated to receive 10,000 Syrian MULIM “refugees” in 2015 between September and December!.

The Refugee Resettlement Program was started under President Jimmy Carter, through the passing of the Refugee Act of 1980. It defined refugees as:

any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of, that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. <Emphasis added>

 Today, it is of special importance to notice read this definition! Basically, the 1980 definition of a refugee is a) any person who is outside any country and b) who is unable or unwilling to return, c)  because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution.

Do the Syrians slated to be received by America meet this definition? Do they meet the three conditions?

1)      Yes, these persons are outside of the country.

2)      Are Syrians unable or unwilling to return ? This is up to the individual. Many have gone back and forth.

3)      Persons slated to come to America as “refugees” are Muslim. Are Syrian Muslims facing persecution or do they have a well-founded fear of persecution? The Islamic State is targeting and persecuting :

a.       Religions other Muslim: mostly Christians and Jews

b.      Shi’ite Muslims

c.       Homosexuals

d.      Journalists

e.       Females

f.       Muslims against sharia

Those persons who are coming from areas threatened by or currently under control of the Islamic State have no reason to fear persecution IF they do not meet any of the 6 conditions listed above, the Islamic State would not persecute or cause fear of persecution.

Most of those slated to be received by America as “refugees” do not qualify as refugees under the 1980 definition, simply because they have no reason to fear persecution as they are Sunni Muslims. Why then are these persons being classified as refugees?

Persons coming to America under the Syrian Refugee title have been labeled as refugees by the United Nations, but they also define refugee as one fleeing persecution. Interestingly, the page with the UN definition of refugee also has much to say about migration. Foremost, that refugees and migrants  are fundamentally different, and for that reason are treated very differently under modern international law.”

Why has the Office of Refugee Resettlement left the legal definition behind? It stands at the very core of their existence, This question alone brings reason to close the Refugee Resettlement Program today until a full evaluation of its expenditures and laxness is evaluated and exposed!

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

What can Anonymous do in the War on Terrorism?

Peoples Pundit Daily:

Anonymous, a name used by a group of hackers originating in France which is now a multinational conglomeration of hack-tivists, declared war on the Islamic State yesterday.

Students of pop culture and computer geeks are asking questions on what can hackers do against the Islamic State? What should hackers be working on to make the Islamic State feel the wrath of a group of hackers?

However, Anonymous needs a basic history lesson before they begin. Anonymous had declared war on Al Qaeda and ISIS. Al Qaeda Iraq (AQI) became the Islamic State of Syria and al-Sham (ISIS). ISIS became the Islamic State. Your declared enemy has not changed. Only the name has changed.

Anonymous has stated they are going to hunt down members of the Islamic State. This sadly is a misplaced effort.  Why? Because those who live in the Islamic State have less access to the Internet and generally use weapons rather than communications. National security professionals today debate the  effectiveness of whack-a-mole. Whack-a-mole means the identifying and forceful closing of accounts identified as being owned by terrorists.  IF this is truly what Anonymous wants to do, their actions may seem vast for little returns.

Anonymous would be better off concentrating their efforts on revealing those currently amongst us who believe and practice the same things that are taught in the Islamic State. Identifying these persons however could produce a lasting effect that would create a safer France, a safer Europe and, a safer America.

For this reason I am providing the following suggestions for Anonymous to be taken seriously as a threat to the Islamic State.

1)      Read Stephen Coughlin’s book, Catastrophic Failure. Learn why intelligence gathering today is messed up! This will enable you to be more successful in your efforts.

2)      Expose the Muslim Brotherhood and its members. The Muslim Brotherhood is the umbrella group under which almost all Islamic terrorists have been or still are members. This action will stop the enablers.

3)      Publicize the Islamic doctrine of al Hijrah: the secret doctrine of migration before jihad.

4)      Expose the enabling politicians who provide platforms for the successful infiltration of future terrorists.

5)      Publish the names of any and all entities currently purchasing oil and other goods from the Islamic State.

These five items are not being addressed by any major media outlets today to say nothing of the intelligence communities around the world. If hack-tivists can get these things accomplished, more power to them.

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

Speaker Ryan forgets he is the Man: Makes noise instead of action

When Speaker Ryan said he was for a “pause” in the Refugee Resettlement Program, he was taking a stand of NO ACTION! Speaker Ryan has the resources and ability to call for a vote to impose a moratorium (temporary prohibition) on any and all work by the Refugee Resettlement program administered by Asst. Secretary of State Ann Richards until a full evaluation of its current success and failures including the reasoning behind bringing persons here who have not been properly vetted creating a hole in national security enabling Americans to be attacked by terrorists on American soil.

Speaker Ryan was supposed to replace the “namby-pamby” nature of Boehner. But Ryan’s words without a stand are nothing more than a pretense of nothingness and a representation of a do nothing Speaker when his party in his power. Ryan could take the bull by the horns and take action. Instead he seems content to do nothing but sound off.

Will Ryan dare to stand tall and take action for all of America’s safety by calling for such a moratorium?  Will he dare to stand tall and be a man of action? Time will likely pass and the media will not ask these important questions because they would cause people to awaken to threats to their personal safety being brought to America! Those who would deny this need only look at Europe where 21% of the Muslims migrating to Europe have been determined to be connected to terrorism.

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

CICs Who Refuse to Identify the Enemy!

Peoples Pundit Daily:

In today’s topsy-turvy world, down means up, bad means good and, the term “Islamic terrorist” is not permitted in public policy conversation. Search the American press releases for the two words together from major media outlets. You will only find the recent challenge to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to put the two words together.

Neither Hillary nor Obama will allow this concept to be communicated to the public. Hillary did say instead that we are fighting against “jihadis” but flat out refused to state it was a battle against “Islamic terrorism.”

Is this semantics?

No, it is a propaganda machine for creating a vacuum effect that removes the “who factor” of just who it is we are at war against. For too long a battle has been waged, with the refusal to acknowledge who it is we are fighting against. This is not solely an Obama problem. It is first and foremost a military problem that has continued through two administrations!

The President of the United States holds the title of Commander-in-Chief (CIC). He is the true head of our military. No one else bears the responsibility. No blame can be placed on generals or admirals, for it is their duty to follow the orders of their commander. It is the CIC alone who has the responsibility of identifying the enemy and he alone who issues orders regarding military actions against foreign entities.

Generals, admirals and lower-ranking officers may be the ones on the front lines, but they ultimately receive their orders from the commander-in-chief.

What kind of war would have been fought in World War II if we refused to say that the enemy was “Nazi Germany” and instead said, “The enemy is only a few German people, but not all Germans are the problem.”
Today America’s enemy stands unidentified!

This enemy is guilty of the following attacks on America, but is not identified by the Obama administration nor will it be identified by any of the presidential contenders from the Democratic Party.
  1. Feb. 26, 1993 New York City a bomb exploded in the basement garage of the World Trade Center, killing 6 and injuring at least 1,040 others.
  2. Nov. 13, 1995 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia a car bomb exploded at U.S. military headquarters, killing 5 U.S. marines.
  3. June 25, 1996 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: truck bomb exploded outside Khobar Towers military complex, killing 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others. 13 Saudis and a Lebanese, all alleged members of Islamic militant group Hezbollah, were indicted on charges relating to the attack in June 2001
  4. Aug. 7, 1998 Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: truck bombs exploded almost simultaneously near 2 U.S. embassies, killing 224 (213 in Kenya and 11 in Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500.
  5. Oct. 12, 2000 Aden, Yemen: The USS Cole, a U.S. Navy destroyer is heavily damaged when a small boat loaded with explosives blew up alongside it. 17 US Navy personnel were killed.
  6. Sept. 11, 2001 New York City, Arlington, Va., and Shanksville, Pa.: hijackers crashed 2 commercial jets into the twin towers of World Trade Center; 2 more hijacked jets were crashed into the Pentagon and a field in rural Pa. Total dead and missing numbered 2,992.
  7. June 14, 2002 Karachi, Pakistan: a bomb exploded outside American consulate killing 12.
  8. May 12, 2003 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: suicide bombers killed 34, including 8 Americans, at housing compounds for Westerners.
  9. June 11–19, 2004 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: terrorists kidnap and execute Paul Johnson Jr., an American, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 2 other Americans and BBC cameraman were killed by gun attacks.
  10. Dec. 6, 2004 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: terrorists stormed the U.S. consulate, killing 5 consulate employees..
  11. Nov. 9, 2005 Amman, Jordan: suicide bombers attacked 3 American hotels, Radisson, Grand Hyatt, and Days Inn, in Amman, Jordan, killing 57.
  12. Sept. 13, 2006 Damascus, Syria: an attack by four gunman on the American embassy is foiled.
  13. Jan. 12, 2007 Athens, Greece: the U.S. embassy is fired on by an anti-tank missile causing damage but no injuries.
  14. Sept. 16, 2008 Yemen: a car bomb and a rocket strike the U.S. embassy in Yemen as staff arrived to work, killing 16 people, including 4 civilians.
  15. June 1, 2009 Little Rock, Arkansas: Abdulhakim Muhammed, a Muslim convert from Memphis, Tennessee, is charged with shooting two soldiers outside a military recruiting center. One is killed and the other is wounded.
  16. Nov. 5, 2009 Fort Hood, Texas: Major Nidal Hasan, goes on a rampage killing 13 and injuring 30.
  17. Dec. 25, 2009: A Nigerian man on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit attempted to ignite an explosive device hidden in his underwear. The explosive device that failed to detonate was a mixture of powder and liquid that did not alert security personnel in the airport
  18. May 1, 2010 New York City: a car bomb is discovered in Times Square, New York City after smoke is seen coming from a vehicle. The bomb was ignited, but failed to detonate and was disarmed before it could cause any harm. Times Square was evacuated as a safety precaution.
  19. Sept. 11, 2012 Benghazi, Libya: militants armed with antiaircraft weapons and rocket-propelled grenades fire upon the American consulate, killing U.S. ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other embassy officials.
  20. April 15, 2013 Boston, Mass.: multiple bombs explode near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. Two bombs go off around 2:50 in the afternoon as runners finish the race. Three people are killed. One is an eight year old boy. More than 260 people are injured.
  21. July 16, 2015 Chattanooga, Tenn: 4 US Marines killed after a terrorist attacked two recruiting stations.

While many of the events listed above had groups or persons identified as committing the terrorist act, no general identifying group of persons is identified. This is a statement that in the 21 events listed above, no commonality exists among the actors of these terrorist deeds.

Is this true, or has the American people been lied to by their commander-in-chiefs? Yes, as in plural. The timeline includes the leadership of not two but three U.S. presidents. Each of them failed to identify that there exists a common thread amongst all 21 acts, which is by no means a complete list. That commonality is persons who want Islamic law to rule the world. Thus, there exists a need to identify the enemy as being Islamist terrorists.

Islamists are those who want every single person on the planet to submit to the rule of sharia–Islamic law. However, if this simple identifier was used today, it would require several federal agencies to take action:
  1. The Muslim Brotherhood would be identified as a terrorist group. Any and all of its entities in the U.S. would be closed and their officers considered for revocation of citizenship and deportation.
  2. All persons entering the U.S., including those planning on becoming citizens, those classified as refugees or classified as other, would have to declare: “I do not believe sharia should be applied to those who are non-Muslim.” Persons refusing to state this would be refused entry.
  3. Those in this country who have made public statements of supremacy of sharia or Islamic law over the U.S. Constitution could have their citizenship revoked.
  4. All federal funding to sources that currently subscribe to this belief would be cut off. Currently, several federal agencies provide financial support both here in the U.S. and abroad to persons and groups that promote the teaching of sharia.

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required