According
to President Obama, as recorded by the New
York Times, the USA is slated to receive 10,000 Syrian MULIM “refugees” in
2015 between September and December!.
The Refugee
Resettlement Program was started under President Jimmy Carter, through the
passing of the Refugee
Act of 1980. It defined refugees as:
…any person who is outside any country
of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality,
is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return
to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection
of, that country because of persecution
or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. <Emphasis
added>
Do the
Syrians slated to be received by America meet this definition? Do they meet the
three conditions?
1)
Yes, these persons are outside of
the country.
2)
Are Syrians unable or unwilling
to return ? This is up to the individual. Many have gone back and forth.
3)
Persons slated to come to America
as “refugees” are Muslim. Are Syrian Muslims facing persecution or do they have
a well-founded fear of persecution? The Islamic State is targeting and
persecuting :
a.
Religions other Muslim: mostly Christians
and Jews
b.
Shi’ite Muslims
c.
Homosexuals
d.
Journalists
e.
Females
f.
Muslims against sharia
Those
persons who are coming from areas threatened by or currently under control of
the Islamic State have no reason to fear persecution IF they do not meet any of
the 6 conditions listed above, the Islamic State would not persecute or cause
fear of persecution.
Most of
those slated to be received by America as “refugees” do not qualify as refugees
under the 1980 definition, simply because they have no reason to fear
persecution as they are Sunni Muslims. Why then are these persons being classified as refugees?
Persons
coming to America under the Syrian Refugee title have been labeled as refugees
by the United Nations, but they also define refugee as one fleeing persecution.
Interestingly, the page with the UN definition of refugee
also has much to say about migration. Foremost, that refugees and migrants “are fundamentally different, and for that reason are
treated very differently under modern international law.”
Why has the Office of Refugee Resettlement
left the legal definition behind? It stands at the very core of their
existence, This question alone brings reason to close the Refugee Resettlement
Program today until a full evaluation of its expenditures and laxness is
evaluated and exposed!
No comments:
Post a Comment