Monday, March 30, 2015

al-Hijrah: The secret Islamic doctrine of Migration for Jihad

(This article has been updated and rewritten: )

Today thousands of Muslims are answering a call to immigrate to non-Muslim lands. According to the Department of Homeland Security, of the 70,000 refugees granted asylum in the USA in 2013 “the leading countries of nationality for refugee admissions were Iraq (28 percent), Burma (23 percent), Bhutan (13 percent), and Somalia (11 percent). Seventy-five percent [75%] of refugee admissions in 2013 were from these four countries” (Martin & Yankay, 2014). If we accept that the vast majority of those living in these countries are Muslim, then 70% of 70,000 translates into 49,000 Muslims migrated to America in 2013.

Why is this happening when fatwas have been given stating it is Haram (forbidden) for a Muslim to move to a non-Muslim land?

Islam Q and A recently answered: Can Muslims settle in kaafir countries for the sake of a better life? Part of the answer stated that:
In the Sunnah, the Prophet (PBUH) said: “I disown every Muslim who settles among the mushrikeen” [non-Muslims]. (Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2645; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.)

According to this manner of thought living in Dar al-Harb is not only wrong for Muslims it was not acceptable to live in non-Islamic communities in Muslim lands, according to their prophet. However, the author of this document does make an exception.

“Rather we should say that each Muslim has his own unique set of circumstances and his own ruling that applies to him, and each person is accountable for himself. If he is able to practise his religion in the Muslim country in which he lives more than he can in a kaafir country, then it is not permissible for him to settle in a kaafir country. 

But if it is the other way round, then it is permissible for him to settle in a kaafir country, subject to the condition that he is confident that he can resist the desires and temptations to be found there by taking the precautionary measures prescribed in sharee’ah. 

Zakariya al-Ansaari al-Shaafa’i said in his book Asna al-Mataalib (4/207): 
It is obligatory to migrate from the kaafir lands to the Muslim lands for those who are able to do that, if they are unable to practise their religion openly.” 

So why are Muslims coming to non-Muslim countries, what they call Dar al-Harb if it is forbidden? Is this merely a smoke screen? Are these very words quoted above only for a select few? It makes little sense that they could not practice what they believe in an Islamic country. Or is this a screening out policy? A doctrinal statement that insists Muslims not strong in their faith must stay in an Islamic country. What then of those who hold their Islamic faith with strength?

Keep in mind that Muslims practice taqiyyah, lying to protect their faith. If they think it is not advantageous to the spreading of Islam, they will lie or obfuscate the truth. Since we cannot trust a Muslim to tell the truth on al-hijrah, we must rely on what the Islamic scriptures state.

According to Hadith no. 2863 Kitab al Amthael reported by Timri, also reported by Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbel as Hadith no 17344 Mohammad said:

I charge you five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage jihad for the sake Allah.

According to this wording it is implied that migration for the purpose of jihad is not only Ok, it is commissioned by the prophet of Islam. But is this the only citation of such a statement?

  • Sura 2:218  “Surely those who believed and those who emigrated and performed jihad.”
  • Sura 8:72    “Surely those who believed and those who emigrated and performed jihad with their money and their lives for the sake Allah, and those who gave asylum…” 
  • Sura 8:74    “And those who believed and emigrated and performed jihad for the sake of Allah, and those who gave asylum and help [gave you victory], those are the true believers, they will receive forgiveness and generous provisions. 
  •  Sura 8:75   ““And those who believed afterward and emigrated and performed jihad with you, so those are of you.

As you can see the Koran provides several examples that the purpose of migration (al-Hijrah) is to accomplish jihad. Shouldn’t Immigration and State Department officials considers this practice when reviewing persons who are Muslim seeking entry into the United States?

Careful thought in this would go back to the first large amount of Muslims coming to America in 1962. Did they come for the purpose of jihad? This would account for the founders of the North American Muslim Brotherhood. It would also explain their usage of the term civilization jihad in 1991 when they defined their goals. It directs the Muslim migrant who came for jihad, on how to pursue that goal.

If Muslims coming here would have the purpose of jihad, you would expect them to:

  1. You would expect to find communities of Muslims starting to request sharia law. 
  2. You would expect to find Muslims here coordinating new Muslims coming to the states into designated areas for the furtherance of Islam and the declaration of sharia law.
  3. Attempt to infiltrate every level of government for the purpose of subverting the constitution.
 These things are happening today! 20,000 Syrian Muslims are slated to arrive in the USA between 2015 and 2016. Will America cease to be the land of the free and become dar al Islam (land of submission) if it does not wake up soon? 

We have to fight and make America wake up NOW! Join the fight and contact Mr. Sutliff about the hijrah in your area of the world.


Martin, D. C., & Yankay, J. (2014, September 5). Refugees and Asylees 2013. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from Department of Homeland Security:

Solomon, S., & Al Maqdasi, E. (2009). Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration. Charlottesville, VA: ANM Publishers.

The Generous Koran. (2009). (U. Dakdok, Trans.) Venice, FL: Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC.

If you like my work, pleas click on the book and make a purchase in order to help me to continue to bring you the truth!

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad
* indicates required

Monday, March 16, 2015

The Dangers of Ignorance in a Civilization Jihadi World

When a group of people have organized and stated their purpose is to commit acts of aggression against your government it is time to pay attention and recognize a self-declared enemy as simply that, an enemy.

When you recognize you have an enemy, it is important to analyze everything about them. Why? Because an enemy must have a weakness! In order to survive and be prepared for whatever an enemy may do against you, you need this information.

Sun Tzu, a Chinese General of great wisdom wrote, If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

What does knowing your enemy mean? If they have a religious belief, it means learning everything about that belief structure. If they have committed acts of aggression previously it would prove beneficial to study them to learn how they may attack and how you can counter that attack. Does the enemy where something to identify themselves? Does the enemy follow certain rules and laws? Where is there headquarters? Who is their leader? These are all drastically important questions to answer when you start to learn about your enemy.

We were attacked on 9/11/2001. We learned the coordinated attack was committed by Al Qaeda. What did we know about Al Qaeda by this point? We knew they were Islamic terrorists because previous to this they had attacked the USS Cole on October 12, 2000, and had bombed our embassies in Tanzanian and Kenya. Did we know who their leader was? Yes, President Clinton stated he was given a chance to take out Osama Bin-Laden just hours before the towers came down (Good, 2014)

We should be analyzing history to understand fully anything and everything about our enemies. A recent article by Muhlenberg entitled Appeasement Kills. Has a clear message on this topic that needs to be heard,

History was meant to be the vehicle by which we learn some hard lessons. But regrettably we mostly ignore the lessons of history, and therefore keep repeating the same old mistakes. And one of the great lessons of history is the folly of seeking to appease our enemies.

When groups have clearly declared their intentions to kill you, you do not seek to just get along with them, or compromise with them – you seek to steadfastly resist them, or else. The story of the Second World War is a classic example of this. (Muehlenberg, 2014)

You may be asking how appeasement fits here. The answer is simple. If we do not recognize a self-declared enemy, they could make demands or requests under the pretense of being a friend for the purpose of manipulation. A self-declared enemy, one who in secret or openly proclaims a mission to destroy you. We have such an enemy and the government is aware of it. – But, the US government has not recognized them as an enemy!

Is this dangerous for America? Read the one paragraph of the Explanatory Memorandum of the North American Muslim Brotherhood found below and decide for yourself.

4- Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America:

The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal. (

Our current president in the United States has issued a statement on White that states that the “Muslim Brotherhood is a non-violent group.” This is so erroneous that I devoted an entire chapter to it in my book, Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam.

When was the last time you heard about the CIA, FBI and various other intelligence groups studying Islam to learn more about their belief structures concerning Jihad? Have you seen any reports of a historical analysis of Islamic governments and there methods of attack?

Why not? Because, if they did report on the various methods of attack they would be telling us about al-hijrah, migration or immigration for the purpose of jihad. This doctrine of migration for the purpose of jihad is as old as Islam itself. The very start date of the Islamic calendar begins when Mohammad and his followers left Mecca for Medina. Without this move Islam would not have grown. Simple analysis of this Islamic concept would place large concerns  regarding an increase in Islamic migration to this country, to any country! Sam Solomon and E. Al Maqdasi have written an incredible book on this concept, which the government should read:  Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra, the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration, Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam?

So what about the Islamic State (IS) or ISIL as Obama insists we call them. He has recruited numerous people to make the claim that they are not Islamic. But why? Several Islamic scholars have backed IS, one only need look at / for the evidence. Is it not dangerous to not know your enemy so much that you insist he does not believe what he openly professes? What purpose does that serve? Look where else this same message is being employed and the answer is there………its sole purpose is a failed attempt to stop Muslims from giving financial assistance to IS.

So what has continual professed ignorance of Islamic terrorism brought us?

·         The inability to understand an increase in Islamic migration into Western civilization as coordinated with a Jihad intent.

·         Public lies by three presidents stating, “Islam is a peaceful religion.” Historically, this is erroneous.

·         Public schools that now preferentially teach more Islam to students than other religions in some states.

·         Social Studies textbooks that prefer Islam to other religions (

·         Removal of Subject Matter Experts who consider the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist entity from training government employees

·         Removal of any and all references to “Islamic terrorism” and “jihad” from all federal training manuals on terrorism.

·         Associated Press insisting that Islamic terrorism not be coupled. AP sets the media standards.

·         Highly placed members of the Muslim Brotherhood in all levels and branches of the federal government ( )



Good, D. (2014, August 1). Bill Clinton, Hours Before 9/11 Attacks: 'I Could Have Killed' Osama bin Laden. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from ABC News:

Greenfield, D. (2014, November 27). Peace with Islam. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from FrontPage Mag:

Muehlenberg, B. (2014, November 28). Appeasement Kills . Retrieved March 10, 2015, from Culture Watch:

If you like my work, please click on the book and make a purchase in order to help me to continue to bring you the truth!

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Taqiyya: The Art of Lying in Islam

There are two branches of the Muslim faith - Sunni and Shiite. The two branches do not disagree in doctrine. They disagree on the original replacement for Mohammed after he died. Some Muslims state that taqiyya is only used by Shiites. However, it is also referenced in Sunni literature as seen below.
1) Ibn Abbas said: Al-Taqiyya is uttering of the tongue, while the heart is comfortable with faith.   [As narrated in Sunan al-Bayhaqi and Mustadrak al-Hakim]

2) Al Hakim stated in his book al-Mustadrak:
The nonbelievers arrested Ammar Ibn Yasir (RA) and (tortured him until) he (RA) uttered  foul words about the Prophet (PBUH&HF), and praised their gods (idols); and  when they released him (RA), he (RA) went straight to the Prophet (PBUH&HF). The Prophet (PBUH&HF) said: "Is there something on your mind?" `Ammar Ibn Yasir (RA) said: "Bad (news)! They would not release me until I defamed you (PBUH&HF) and praised their gods!" The Prophet (PBUH&HF) said: "How do you find your heart to be?" `Ammar (RA) answered: "Comfort-able with faith." So the Prophet (PBUH&HF) said: "Then if they come back for you, then do the same thing all over again." Allah (SWT) at that moment revealed the verse: "....except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in faith...[16:106]       [Narrated by Abd al-Razak, Ibn Sa'd, Ibn Jarir, Ibn Abi Hatim, Ibn Mardawayh, al-Bayhaqi in his book al- Dala-il.]
3) After the conquest of the city of Khaybar by the Muslims, the Prophet (PBUH&HF) was approached by Hajaj Ibn `Aalat and told: "O Prophet of Allah: I have in Mecca some excess wealth and some relatives, and I would like to have them back; am I excused if I bad-mouth you (to escape persecution)?" The Prophet (PBUH&HF) excused him and said: "Say whatever you have to say." [al-Sirah al-Halabiyyah, v3, p61]
4) "(Verily) we smile for some people, while our hearts curse (those same people)." [Narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari, v7, p102, that Abu al-Darda']
Mohammad said, “War is deceit.”[Bukhari:V4B52N268] Unless we start with the understanding that some Muslims intend to deceive us to further their religion, we are ill equipped and unprepared when we listen to Muslims make statements. We have to step back and examine them now and see if we are being lied to. Understanding of taqiyya should cause difficulty for any court of law to easily accept a Muslim’s statement as truthful if it could be interpreted as damaging the progress of Islam. Now imagine the concept of taqiyya applied in classrooms and throughout the political arena. Would students be able to learn the truth about Islam from Muslims? Would Muslim in the political arena seek to deceive us?

One example of the use of taqiyya in the political arena was given on February 12, 2011, in Washington DC, at the annual meeting of the American Conservative Union, also known as CPAC by Suhail Khan. Suhail Khan, was Assistant to the Secretary for Policy under U.S. Secretary Mary Peters at the U.S. Department of Transportation under President George W. Bush. Khan is now on the Board of Directors of the American Conservative Union. Khan was recorded saying at the 2011 CPAC, “There is no Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.”[PJTV. (2011, February 12). ACU's Suhail Khan: "There is no Muslim Brotherhood in the United States." . Retrieved March 11, 2015, from You Tube:] Yet, we have known Mr. Khan’s statement to be false for some time now. What really came of the statement was an exposé of the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrating even the conservative movement in America.

How do we know Mr. Khan was practicing taqiyya? We know that his family has been active in Muslim Brotherhood front groups for decades. But to further the evidence that Mr. Khan himself was practicing taqiyya when he spoke, I will show that he is registered as a speaker for one of the front groups of the Muslim Brotherhood!

Suhail Khan’s family is well known in the Muslim community for their “pioneering actions,” according to the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), “Dr. Khan [Suhail’s father] was one of the founders of Muslim Students Association of America in 70’s which later became the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).”[Obituary: Mahboob Khan. (1999, May). Retrieved July 13, 2013, from Islamic Voice: COMMUNity.HTM] As you will see in the next chapter, this makes Suhail’s father an active member in the Muslim Brotherhood. Suhail’s mother, Malika Khan, has served on the Executive Committee of the San Francisco Bay Area (SFBA) chapter of CAIR (the Council on American Islamic Relations). In January 2011, the SFBA Chapter of CAIR placed a warning on its website telling people not to talk to representatives of the FBI.

Further evidence comes from a June 2001 meeting the American Muslim Council held in Chicago. At that meeting, Abdurrahman Alamoudi, a person who would plead guilty to terrorism related charges three years later, said:

When Suhail Khan started not too many people were aware that we had to do something. I am really proud to be with Suhail Khan. Some of you saw in today the White House but inshallah soon you see him in better places in the White House. Inshallah. Maybe sometimes as vice-president soon, inshallah. [APPLAUSE] Allah akbar. [Gaffney, F. (2014, February 1). Adbulrahman Alamoudi. Retrieved July 13, 2013, from Center for Security Policy
But it is Suhail’s own words that cause him harm. In 1999, he was speaking at an ISNA Conference. He started to discuss what he considered the injustices of the American government and said the following:

Our freedoms, my dear brothers and sisters, are under attack. Our freedom to associate with whomsoever we choose, to speak out politically and religiously, to travel, to practice our faith as Allah has instructed us as God-fearing men and women must be protected. And these rights must be defended with all the determination, all the resources, all the unyielding vigilance of the believing mujahid. That is the spirit of Islam. The mark of the Muslim. These are the life and death struggles that we Muslims face every day of our lives. The struggle is by no means a new one. [Suhail Khan Speech at 1999 ISNA Conference. (1999, July 4)
Retrieved July 13, 2013, from Suhail Khan Exposed:


The above is a portion of my book Stealth Jihad Phase 2: Infiltrate American Colleges 

If you like my work, please click on the book and make a purchase in order to help me to continue to bring you the truth!

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required