Paul Sutliff on the jihadi murder in France of Samuel Paty

 

Please support my work by giving through PayPal or by sending a check to Paul Sutliff, PO Box 12846, 4455 Lake Avenue, Rochester, NY 14612.

What your children are learning about Islam in schools is dangerous!

 

Please support my work by giving through PayPal or by sending a check to Paul Sutliff, PO Box 12846, 4455 Lake Avenue, Rochester, NY 14612.

Important Responses to the CT Mirror Promoting Misinformation on Jihad by an Islamist!

I

By Paul Sutliff

The CT (Connecticut) Mirror recently published, "At Muslim Sunday school, learning about Islam — and correcting misconceptions" by Vanessa De La Torre. This article had a lot of misinformation within it. Sadly, this comes as no surprise since the "trusted source" was Dr. Reza Mansoor. 

Dr. Reza Mansoor is not someone to trust when he talks to non-Muslims about what Muslims believe. Part of this is because he believes it in Islam's best interest to deceive you, the non-Muslims about what Islam teaches on Jihad. This practice is part and parcel of practicing shariah and deceiving the non-believer.

This article provides no sources to stand behind Dr. Reza Mansoor's statements on jihad. It ignores shariah which is cited in Reliance on the Traveller. An English translation of Arabic Umdat al-Salik. This book is recommended by the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). I  personally recommend to anyone who wants the truth on what jihad means to read o.9.0 Jihad. I also recommend reading the 1915 Fatwa given by the last official caliph. This fatwa was very clear on what jihad means and how it should be carried out. It speaks of three different levels of jihad, Heart, Word, and Action/Deed.

It is unethical in this country for a person claiming the title of professor to purposefully misinform the public in the area of his/her content. This is grounds for dismissal by professorial malfeasance.

In the same respect, articles and books exposing the recent lies of Dr. Mansoor on this topic were previously written in detail. "How Taqiyya Alters Islam's Rules of WarDefeating Jihadist Terrorism," by Raymond Ibrahim  was published in the Winter of 2010. This is among the best responses to this misinformation. Humorously, it was written 9 years ago.

My suggestion is for CT Mirror should remove the purposeful misinformation by Dr. Mansoor. Reliability of sources is key for any piece of journalism. Dr. Mansoor has shown himself not to be credible! 

Jane Bate, of Connecticut ACT! for America also wrote a response: 

I was very disappointed to read Vanessa de la Torre's article, "At Muslim Sunday school, learning about Islam and correcting misconceptions." This piece is full of 'taqiyya,' the obligatory deception of non-Muslims. An explanation of this phenomenon can be found in section r8.2 of the "Reliance of the Traveller": r8.2 “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory”.

In the article, we're told the popular line that 'jihad' means a personal or spiritual struggle. Though it can mean that, and that sort of 'jihad' is considered the 'greater jihad,' nonetheless, approximately 98% of the times the word 'jihad' appears in Islamic doctrine, its meaning is military warfare. To describe it as a "personal struggle, then, is disingenuous.

And, of course, there's the ubiquitous claim that Islam is the "religion of peace." But how peaceful is a religion that mandates death for apostasy? (Section o8.1 of the Reliance) How about a religion that assigns no penalty to a Muslim who kills his children, grandchildren or non-Muslims? (Section o1.2 of the Reliance). Lastly, a thorough reading of the section of 'jihad' -military warfare against unbelievers - which begins with Section o9.0, will leave the reader with no doubts that this is no religion of peace.”

Please support my work by giving through PayPal or by sending a check to Paul Sutliff, PO Box 12846, 4455 Lake Avenue, Rochester, NY 14612.

EXPOSE: Is Dr. Qanta A. Ahmed to be trusted when she speaks about Islam?

Dr. Qanta A. Ahmed is indeed an expert in both Sleep Medicine and Journalism. She extensively writes for many publications against Anti-Semitism, for which she should be commended. She is also noted as being interviewed and published on “radical” Islam. This article seeks to expose that Dr. Ahmed, an incredible expert in Sleep Disorders and a noted journalist on Anti-Semitism, does not communicate truthfully about Islam, or she is communicating a lack of knowledge of Islam. This would remove her “expertise” on “radical” Islam.

On February 14, 2019, Dr. Qanta Ahmed published Opinion: Ilhan Omar Brings Shame To American Muslim in the Daily Caller in which she gives credentials as being a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. She wrote in the first sentence that:

Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), an American Muslim of Somali origin, shames American Muslims with the anti-Semitism she has brought to Congress.

In the very first sentence in this article Dr. Ahmed reveals she is either dishonest in what she communicates as being Islamic, or she is not knowledgeable of Islamic sources which disagree with her. In addition, her comments go against the Anti-Semitism just being discovered as being expressed in many mosques in North America thanks to the hard work of organizations like the Middle East Media Research Initiative (MEMRI). Her claim that Anti-Semitism views shame American Muslims is also negated by the expressed views of many American Muslims.

A quick visit to Dr. Ahmed’s website, https://www.qantaahmed.com reveals some interesting points. She has outstanding credentials and awards as a medical doctor and an incredible expert in the field of Sleep Disorders. Her bio makes no claim of expertise on Islam or on radical Islam.

1. A citizen of the UK and a naturalized citizen of the United States in 2015.
2. A medical doctor with demonstrable credentials, awards, and success as an expert in both Pulmonology and Sleep Disorders. (verified)
3. A journalist on Antisemitism and noted Fiction writer.

While Dr. Ahmed may not claim to be an expert on Islam in her bio, her statement that the Anti-Semitism of Rep. Omar, shames American Muslims makes her out to speak for all American Muslims. Is she even close to right on this?

MEMRI translated a February 14, 2019 broadcast from Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas/Gaza). This clip showed the mother of Muhammad Said Ali, a 19 year old Palestinian who was killed when he attacked Israeli policemen with a knife at the Damascus Gate in Jerusalem. She says in this clip that

"Muhammad was someone you could rely on. He was a hell of a guy. A butcher. A lion. You could see in the video of the attack how practiced he was in wielding a knife, because he was a butcher. Muhammad was a butcher and knew how to slaughter."

Granted this is not American Islam, but Islam from an area of Israel that is Islamic and run by an entity that claims to be following Islam. What do North American Muslims preach in Mosques?

Toronto Sun, writer Tarek Fatah, wrote Muslims shouldn’t pray to defeat non-Muslims on January 13, 2015. Fatah wrote:

One of the reasons I avoid attending Friday congregations at mosques is a specific ritual supplication uttered by Imams at many mosques in Canada and around the world, just prior to our formal Friday community prayer, the Juma’a.

In the supplication, the cleric prays to Allah for, among other things, to grant “Muslims victory over the ‘Qawm al-Kafiroon,’” the Arabic phrase that lumps all non-Muslims — Jews, Hindus, Christians, Atheists, Buddhists and Sikhs — into one derogatory category, the “Kuffar”, or non-Muslims.

This supplication is not obligatory. Not uttering this prayer would in no way adversely affect the holiness or solemnness of the collective community prayer. 

I have long argued with my orthodox and conservative Muslim friends and family that at least when living among non-Muslims, we should avoid praying for their defeat at the hands of Muslims.

While Tarek Fatah is showing that Imam’s are indeed offering prayers against Jews, he also showed that the Muslims are praying for governmental conquest against all other religions.

MEMRI recently reviewed a video of Detroit, Michigan Shi’ite Imam, Bassem Al-Sheraa given on January 27, 2019, in which he said:

[The Jews] employ tricks and fraud in matters of religion and moral values. They distort [sacred texts], and therefore it is said that the Jews would often kill their own prophets. They would sanction the killing of one another. In addition, they allowed their women to engage in prostitution, God forbid. Following the [Babylonian] captivity, when Nebuchadnezzar exiled them and destroyed the Temple, the Jews said: 'Money and women are our most powerful weapons.'

MEMRI also noted the lectures uploaded October 2016-January 2019 to the YouTube channel of the Nur Uz-Zamaan Institute in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In these lectures, Imam Nareem Abdullah makes several AntiSemitic statements:

October 15, 2016:  "Some of you think the Roman Empire stopped, because your [knowledge of] history is kind of weak. The American Empire is often considered by many scholars to be Pax Romana, and a continuation of the Roman Empire. It's the same people, they just relocated the capital. Even if you look deeper, behind the scenes – Jews [are] running everything. The real Jews, or the Ashkenazi [Jews]?

April 7, 2018: "We ask Allah to guide us on the straight path, the path of those who have Your blessing. Just in case, not the path of those who have Your anger. If you read the commentaries, you know that Allah is talking about the Jews. In the fatiha [opening chapter of the Quran], we are asking Allah to guide us on the straight path and [to not] make us like the Jews. That is in your fatiha. 'And not like those who go astray' – the Christians.

"A lot of people may try to twist that and turn that around and say: 'See, you hate Christians and Jews.' No, no, no... The Prophet Moses was a Muslim. His true followers were Muslims. Prophet Jesus was a Muslim. His true followers were Muslims. When you corrupt the religion that they came with – then you come up with these other religions.

MEMRI.org also exposed a NYC Cleric Ibn Muneer: Islam Without Jihad Is Like Honey Without The Sweetness; Don't Apologize For Speaking The Truth About Jihad, Jews, And Christians on December 17, 2018. Imam Ibn Muneer said:

You make a statement or a comment about this, about that, about the Christians, about the Jews… What do they do? Huh? They get a problem. 'We have to edit the video, Sheikh.' 'We have to make the video private, Sheikh, because you mentioned that the Jews are those who earned Allah's wrath.' 'You said that the Jews are those who earned Allah's wrath and they are jealous – we can't publish the video.' 

What is this? And what's next? The next thing that bothers them, irritates them, or is politically incorrect, we take that out, we don't mention that, and we don't talk about… What is this? When does it stop, the neutering of the Muslim, spading his courage. When does it stop?

Sadly, there are many more examples of such Anti-Semitic statements by Imams across the USA and Canada. So is Dr. Ahmed even close to accurate, when she claims that American Muslims are offended by Anti-Semite, Rep. Omar?

Islamic scholar Robert Spencer says, that none of what Dr. Qanta Amad is saying is true! He writes that:

There is a strong native strain of anti-Semitism in Islam, rooted in the Qur’an. The Qur’an puts forward a clear, consistent image of the Jews: they are scheming, treacherous liars and the most dangerous enemies of the Muslims. 

The Qur’an presents Muhammad as the last and greatest in the line of Biblical prophets, preaching a message identical to theirs. The identical character of their messages may seem odd to those who know very well that the Qur’an’s contents are quite different in character from those of the Bible, but the Qur’an has an ingenious explanation for this: the original message of all the Biblical prophets was Islam, and they were all Muslims. Only later did their followers corrupt their messages to create Judaism and Christianity. 

Consequently, in the Qur’an, Abraham is not a Jew or a Christian, but a Muslim (3:67); his message was identical to Muhammad’s. The Islamic claim is that the authentic Torah actually commands Jews to follow Muhammad and recognize his prophecy. Those who refuse to accept Muhammad as a prophet are, in the Muslim view, rejecting both Moses and the prophecies of the Torah. It is no surprise, then, that in the Qur’an both David and Jesus curse the disbelieving Jews for their disobedience (5:78).

Yet of course, Torah-observant Jews did not and do not accept Muhammad as a prophet, and this, according to Islamic tradition, enraged the prophet of Islam during his lifetime. According to Islamic tradition, Muhammad initially appealed energetically to the Jews, hoping they would accept his prophetic status. He even had the Muslims imitate the Jews by facing Jerusalem for prayers, and he adopted for the Muslims the Jews’ prohibition of pork. But he was infuriated when the Jews rejected him, and Allah shared his fury in Qur’anic revelation: “And when there came to them a messenger from Allah, confirming what was with them, a party of the people of the Book threw away the Book of Allah behind their backs, as if they did not know!” (2:101). 

Another Jewish leader noted that “no covenant was ever made with us about Muhammad.” Allah again responded through his Prophet: “Is it ever so that when they make a covenant a party of them set it aside? The truth is, most of them do not believe” (2:100). In fact, Allah gave food laws to the Jews because of their “wrongdoing,” and “for their turning many from the way of Allah” (4:160), and by doing so, “repaid them for their injustice” (6:146). Some Jews are “avid listeners to falsehood” who “distort words beyond their usages.” These are “the ones for whom Allah does not intend to purify their hearts,” and they will be punished not just in hellfire but in this life as well: “For them in this world is disgrace, and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment” (5:41). 

Jews dare to deny divine revelation, claiming that “Allah did not reveal to a human being anything,” to which Muhammad is told to respond, “Who revealed the Scripture that Moses brought as light and guidance to the people? You [Jews] make it into pages, disclosing some of it and concealing much” (6:91). …

Robert Spencer’s article is highly detailed citing several Islamic sources. This is a small piece of this exposure that Americans were being deceived when Dr. Ahmed claimed that American Muslims are offended by the Anti-Semitic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.

So what was the purpose of the statement by Dr. Ahmed? Was it to claim that Muslims here in North America hold different beliefs from the Muslims in the Arab world? Was it to state all Muslims love Jews? My conclusion, is that Dr. Ahmed, while a notable expert in the medical field is either full of deceit when she claims to know anything about Islam and thus a voice piece of deception for the major media outlets to eagerly consume or she is supremely ignorant of a faith she professes to hold. In either case, she should not be trusted for any statements she makes about Islam as a whole. Please understand her medical expertise is not in question at all. I believe she has earned respect and trust in the medical field! However, her words about Islam promote Civilization Jihad by duping the masses who listen to her claim that American Muslims despise Anti-Semitism.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

Email Address *

First Name

Last Name

Books

Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam $17.00 USD  Stealth Jihad Phase 2: Infiltrate American Colleges $7.00 USD

 

---

Please support my work by giving through PayPal or by sending a check to Paul Sutliff, PO Box 12846, 4455 Lake Avenue, Rochester, NY 14612.

Taqiyya Interfaith Practioner caught claiming "Islam means Shalom"

On April 22, 2015 Dr. Muhammad Shafiq held a meeting to discuss his latest book and was accompanied by co-editor Dr. Nathan Kollar.

The evening started surprisingly slow and revealed that both Dr. Kollar and Dr. Shafiq were unprepared for the event. Neither brought one thing to share with the audience besides themselves. There was a projector for a professional presentation available as well as an ELMO for sharing hard copy information. As an author I was embarrassed for them as this was a highly unprofessional presentation, I have done numerous book talks and not once did I come so unprepared!

Dr. Kollar stated at the beginning of this meeting that he and Dr. Shafiq had been working on the Hickey Interfaith Center for 15 years at Nazareth College of Rochester.

They talked about the importance of interfaith dialogue and asked why we came to listen to them. I openly stated my name and that I am an author, and was concerned that this was a platform for Civilization Jihad and that I wanted to hear him address the section in his book that claims Jesus led a jihad.

When the began to talk about the scriptures of each religion, Dr. Kollar spoke of the Tanak (the law, the prophets and the writings), what Christians refer to as the Old Testament and when he spoke of the Bible he stated they were written by men. When he referred to the Koran he stated it was given by God. Our local media representative, Shannon Joy of WYSL stopped him and said Christians and Jews believe their scriptures come from God not man. Dr. Kollar apologized stating he did not mean to say otherwise.

It was then that I also contributed, but the Koran as Dr. Shafiq states, was given not by God, but by an angel. I pointed out that these two entities are not the same. Christians and Jews believe their scriptures are inspired by God and were not given by angels. However Islam has quite the different story. This was quickly brushed off as semantics. Dr. Kollar served as an apologist for Islam stating that this is pretty much the same thing.

The other Christian present also pointed out that Dr. Shafiq could not have this discussion in his own home country and likely would be killed for daring to have it, this Christian stated that Islam needs to deal with the violent actions of those who are Muslim in Muslim countries to have a serious discussion in interfaith when including Islam.

Dr. Kollar led the discussion to talking about the importance of dialogue and honesty in the dialogue. That was when I had to speak up. That is what the letter below is all about. Please read this and write to Dr. Daan Braveman about your concerns regarding this matter.

Dear President Braaveman and Board of Trustees:

Last night Dr. Muhammad Shafiq presented at the Brighton Public Library on his latest book with Dr. Nathan Kollar, professor emeritus of St. John Fischer College. I went with interest since my last encounter with Dr. Shafiq proved rather revealing.

Dr. Nathan Kollar talked about the importance of honesty in interfaith relations. I shared that this is an important point “since in my last encounter with Dr. Shafiq, I asked what Islam means and he replied peace.” I continued, “I told Dr. Shafiq to stop lying and tell people what it means in Arabic” and explained that Dr. Shafiq paused and said “Submission.” I stated that I have grave concerns when someone who is supposed to be teaching kids (college age) is lying to people about the religion he is supposed to be teaching. Dr. Shafiq replied in front of 20 people, “Islam means the same thing as shalom.” I am no fool. I have a BA in Religion and Philosophy with extensive training in Hebrew. I also have at my disposal an expert in Arabic who will also communicate that Dr. Shafiq’s HIGHLY OFFENSIVE equation of submission andshalom is nothing other than a purposeful lie!

Due to the blatant lie of Dr. Muhammad Shafiq of Nazareth College of Rochester to the public, I have great concerns about what he is teaching to anyone who is not a Muslim. I understand that lying to non-Muslims about what they believe is part of their faith, they have a doctrine called taqiyyah. BUT, when a person who is paid to run an inter-faith center and teaches young impressionable minds at a college is caught lying about the very topic he was hired to teach I am concerned.

Can Nazareth College of Rochester knowingly continue a relationship with a man who openly lies to non-Muslims in public forums about what Islam teaches? As a NAZ graduate myself, I HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS THAT A PERSON PRACTICING TAQIYYA IS AFFILIATED WITH NAZARETH!

You should know a member of the Press was there last night and this is likely to be a discussion on her radio show, especially after both the presenters talked about the importance of honesty in interfaith discussions!

 Sincerely,

Paul Sutliff

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

Email Address *

INFILTRATION AND OBFUSCATION ALERT! Part 2 of 4

Obama's Islamizing American History 

aka 

(Obfuscation vs. poorly educated President, you choose)

In Part 1 of the “Are We Safe?” series, I proposed 10 things the average man should be able to see if our government has been infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood. This theme continues by examining the first two items the average American should be able to see IF our government has been infiltrated.

1.  If we are watching for Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of our government you would expect to see an inordinate reflection of the population in high government roles. For example if the US population of Muslims was 3% you would not expect to find 25% of high governmental positions are filled by Muslims.

So is there an inordinate amount of Muslims working in the executive branch? To have the exact figures I filled an FOIA with Equal Employment Opportunity Center (EEOC), which keeps statistics.

What is known is that the following past and present Obama appointees are Muslims. Note that Huma Abedin is included because the president would have had to approve her position.

John Brennan	CIA Director (Wahabbi Muslim)
Huma Abedin	Former Advisor to Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State
Arif Alikhan	Former DHS Asst. Secretary
Muhamad Elibiary	Former DHS Advisory Council Member
Rashad Hussain	Special Envoy to OIC, Recently appointed Coordinator of Counterterrorism Communications
Afeefa Syeed	Senior Advisor at the US Agency for International Development Middle East and Asia Bureaus
Asma Mirza	OMB representative at the White House mentioned on WH Memos as someone staff must confer with regarding their budgets. Miss Mirza holds meetings at the WH but her salary is not listed in violation of federal policy!
Lema Bashir	Lawyer Civil Rights Division, DOJ.
Eboo Patel	Advisory Council onFaith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships
Imam Mohamed Magid	Obama Advisor (President’s Meeting on Commonsense Immigration Reform, meets privately with the president)
Barak Hussein Obama	President of the United States (Note his usage of personal pronouns in the quotes below in regards to Islam.)

More details will be provided on many of these individuals as the series continues.Many of the persons listed above are discussed in detail my book, Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam. You will also find an examination of the White House Visitor Logs which will be mentioned in a later installment in this series.

We are now up to the second infiltration indicator the average person could see.

2. Obfuscation of historical facts would be utilized to paint a pretty picture of the Muslim Brotherhood which has a violent history. The more popular terms here is propaganda would be used to recreate the Muslim Brotherhood into an imaginary non-violent hippie type group.

The long history of the violence of the Muslim Brotherhood can be easily seen through its assassinations, violent action through its Palestinian Branch aka HAMAS, and the recent history in Egypt which includes an attack on police.

I have additionally included the following statements by President Obama which are obfuscations of historical fact. In other words, they are attempts at providing misinformation (aka PROPAGANDA) to the American people. For the purpose of directly addressing purposeful obfuscation and demonstrating accuracy in citation, what was said before and/or after the item being declared propaganda is also provided with a direct link to where it was found at WhiteHouse.gov.

President Barak Obama addressing Egyptians at Cairo University in Egypt (June 4, 2009):

As a student of history, I also know civilization's debt to Islam.  It was Islam -- at places like Al-Azhar -- that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment.  It was innovation in Muslim communities -- (applause) -- it was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra; our magnetic compass and tools of navigation; our mastery of pens and printing; our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed.  Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation.  And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.  (Applause.)

I also know that Islam has always been a part of America's story.  The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco.  In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second President, John Adams, wrote, "The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims."  And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States.  They have fought in our wars, they have served in our government, they have stood for civil rights, they have started businesses, they have taught at our universities, they've excelled in our sports arenas, they've won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and lit the Olympic Torch.  And when the first Muslim American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers -- Thomas Jefferson -- kept in his personal library.

In regards to his mention of Islam contributing "cherished music," Islamic law, Shariah forbids the playing of musical instruments and the only music allowed is unaccompanied vocal music. This can be found in Reliance of the Traveller (Shariah translated into English):

r40. 1 (Ibn Hajar Haytami;) As for the condemnation of musical instruments, flutes, strings, and the like by the Truthful and Trustworthy (Allah bless him and give him peace), who "does not speak from personal caprice: it is nothing besides a revelation inspired" (Koran 53:3-4),  let those who refuse to obey him beware lest calamity strike them, or a painful torment. The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said;

(1) "Allah Mighty and Majestic sent me as a guidance and mercy to believers and commanded me to do away with musical instruments, flutes, strings, crucifixes, and the affair of the pre-fslamic period of ignorance." 

(2) "On the Day of Resurrection, Allah will pour molten lead into the ears of whoever sits listening to a songstress' 

Just in case you are unsure as to what Sharia says about vocal music unaccompanied by any musical instruments:

SINGING UNACCOMPANIED BY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

r40.3 (Ibn Ilajar Haymmi:) As for listening to singing that is not accompanied by instruments.

one should know that singing or listening to singing is offensive except under the circumstances to be mentioned in what follows. Some scholars hold that singing is sunna at weddings and the like, and of our Imams, Ghazaii and 'Izzibn^Abdal-Salam say that it is sunna if it moves one to a noble state of mind that makes one remember the hereafter.
It is clear from this that all poetry which encourages good deeds, wisdom, noble qualities, abstinence from this- worldly things, or similar pious traits such as urging one to obey Allah, follow the sunna, or shun disobedience, is sunna to write, sing, or listen to, as more than one of our Imams have stated is obvious, since using a means to do
good is itself doing good...

Note that Barak Obama just stated he grew up in a Muslim country yet is stating that Islam has made contributions to music. This is obfuscation of historical fact. It is also considered taqiyya, lying to protect the Islamic faith.

"...since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States.  They have fought in our wars, they have served in our government, they have stood for civil rights, they have started businesses, they have taught at our universities, they've excelled in our sports arenas, they've won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and lit the Olympic Torch."


Were there any Muslims here in the 1700s? The historical answer is that if any were here they were sold into slavery and were working on plantations in the South. However, considering that many of the sellers of slaves in Africa were Muslims it is unlikely they sold fellow Muslims as slaves. No historical record exists that verifies that one Muslim was present at the writing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 or at the Constitutional Convention in 1789 that resulted in the Constitution of the United States of America.

Keith Ellison was the first Muslim elected to serve in Congress in 2007. He had served in the state of Minnesota as a representative, but this is all recent history.

Civil Rights? Malcolm X is often listed with Civil Rights activists from the sixties. But even he admits that his understanding of Islam was errant. According to his own words the Nation of Islam is not true Islam. The great Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was known for his amazing fortitude of a nonviolent nature which led to the incredible pinnacle of his "I have a Dream" speech.  The Nation of Islam were not nonviolent during this time and were kept separate from the Civil Rights Movement as seen here

So President Obama lied to the Egyptians when he said these things. Was he also lying to Americans when he said these things?

Lets look at the tallest buildings in the USA. Were any Muslims present when the Empire State Building went up? How about the World Trade Center buildings or the Sears tower in Chicago? Again our president obfuscated, in other words, he LIED to promote Islam in America.

Were there any American Muslim Nobel Prize winners? NO.

After all these obfuscations "LIES" about American history from a sitting President shouldn't Americans be concerned? Are we seeing the second sign of infiltration of our government through our Presidents lies about American history? Perhaps this President who has a Harvard education was just poorly educated? You would think his staff would make sure he would not repeat these lies. But he did.

 President Barak Obama at Iftar Dinner, Washing, DC (July 25, 2013):

Throughout our history, Islam has contributed to the character of our country, and Muslim Americans, and their good works have helped to build our nation -- and we’ve seen the results.  We’ve seen those results in generations of Muslim immigrants -- farmers and factory workers, helping to lay the railroads and build our cities.  Muslim innovators who helped build some of our highest skyscrapers and who helped to unlock the secrets of our universe. 

 Is President Obama the only president to lie about past American history? I can not find one other example. But was the real purpose here to put American history through an Islamic lens to accomplish Islamization of Knowledge? This is something I wrote about that the Muslim Brotherhood is promoting at the International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Watch for the third installment on "Is America Safe?" Items three through five will be expanded on.

Subscribe to our mailing list and be Informed on Civilization Jihad

* indicates required

Email Address *