Germany had an 11 year old Muslim threaten his teacher’s life because of a required talk about the death of Samuel Paty in France. An Imam was called who spoke to the child, likely in Arabic saying one thing while saying another in German claiming that “nobody should be killed.” This wording likely comes from a passage in Quran 5:32:
Because of that We ordained for the
Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder,
or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all
mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all
mankind.
Note that the passage refers to Jews taking a life being
wrong, not to Muslims.
This week Germany also had, an Imam seen dragging a man wearing
a leash with a picture of France’s president, Emannuel Macron covering his face.
“Syrian
YouTuber Fayez Kanfash dragged by rope "Macron, the dog" – a man
wearing a mask of French President Emmanuel Macron through the streets of
Berlin. While burning pictures of Macron, Kanfash hit the man and shouted at
him that he is a lowlife and a dog.” This open display of a belief in Islamic
supremacy over all other governments and beliefs was encouraged by Muslims
heard in the background saying Allah Akbar. But it was barely noticed by the
Germans now accustomed to such displays.
But perhaps the most caustic alarm about the hijrah/migration
of Syrians was in the German Berliner
Kourier that reported a Syrian man who lamented on missing being a
jihadi. He wants to go back and be a jihadi again. Of course that led to his immediate
arrest.
Five years ago I wrote an article titled, “When
is a Refugee not a Refugee?” When I wrote this article a massive Hijrah was
underway to take Europe by storm with the deception that these migrants were
fleeing persecution. This deceptive claim made it to North America. Here we were
calling them “refugees.” Europe knew better. There they were calling these travellers “economic
migrants.” The Independent, a United Kingdom news source, titled a article on
this topic “Refugee
crisis: 'Economic migrants' and asylum seekers are coming to Europe for the
same reasons, report says.” In 2015, political correctness demanded a
blending of terminology that would serve as a deception to Europeans and
Western civilization as a whole. Refugees, asylum seekers and, economic migrants,
are by definition two separate groups as the have two different reasons behind
their moving from their native lands. Asylum seekers are very much like
refugees, however there is one big difference. Asylum seekers are already in country.
In the United States of America a refugee is currently
defined by 8
USC §1101 (42):
The term "refugee" means
(A) any person who is outside any country of such person's
nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any
country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or
unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself
of the protection of, that country because of persecution or a well-founded
fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a
particular social group, or political opinion, or
(B) in such special circumstances as the President after
appropriate consultation (as defined in section 1157(e) of this title) may specify, any person who is within the country of such
person's nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, within
the country in which such person is habitually residing, and who is
persecuted or who has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race,
religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political
opinion.
The term "refugee" does not include any person who
ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any
person on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular
social group, or political opinion.
If
you are paying attention to the highlighted material above you can see a
requirement of fear of persecution is required to meet the status of a refugee.
This is extremely important considering the United Nations definition of
refugee was in agreement with US law when I wrote my article on November 19,
2015.
The
link above to the legal definition on refugees also cites, President George H.W.
Bush explained in a memorandum dated February 7, 1995 (60 F.R. 7885):
It is a fundamental right and duty for a nation to protect the
integrity of its borders and its laws. This Administration shall stand
firm against illegal immigration and the continued abuse of our immigration
laws. By closing the back door to illegal immigration, we will continue to open
the front door to legal immigrants.
My
Administration has moved swiftly to reverse the course of a decade of failed
immigration policies. Our initiatives have included increasing overall Border
personnel by over 50 percent since 1993. We also are strengthening worksite
enforcement and work authorization verification to deter employment of illegal
aliens. Asylum rules have been reformed to end abuse by those falsely
claiming asylum, while offering protection to those in genuine fear of
persecution. …
Seeking a better economic status is not by any stretch of the imagination
an equivalent of someone fearing persecution! In 2015, I wrote specifically
about the Syrians migrating. Not any other nationality. Here is a portion of
the article.
Today, it is of special importance
to notice read this definition! Basically, the 1980 definition of a refugee is
a) any person who is outside any country and b) who is unable or unwilling to
return, c) because of persecution or a
well-founded fear of persecution.
Do the Syrians slated to be
received by America meet this definition? Do they meet the three conditions?
1)
Yes, these persons are outside of the country.
2) Are Syrians unable or unwilling to return
? This is up to the individual. Many have gone back and forth.
3) Persons slated to come to America as
“refugees” are Muslim. Are Syrian Muslims facing persecution or do they have a
well-founded fear of persecution? The Islamic State is targeting and
persecuting :
a. Religions other Muslim:
mostly Christians and Jews
b. Shi’ite Muslims
c. Homosexuals
d. Journalists
e. Females
f. Muslims against
sharia
Those persons who are coming from
areas threatened by or currently under control of the Islamic State have no
reason to fear persecution IF they do not meet any of the 6 conditions listed
above, the Islamic State would not persecute or cause fear of persecution.
Most of those slated to be received by America as “refugees” do
not qualify as refugees under the 1980 definition, simply because they have no
reason to fear persecution as they are Sunni Muslims. Why then are these
persons being classified as refugees?
It is now 2020, the UN now defines a
refugee more broadly to include those fleeing conflict. This makes taking any
refugee classified as such by the UN a violation of US law unless they are
individually assessed to be threatened with having a legitimate fear of
persecution. Pursuing a “better economic status” is not fearing being bodily
harmed or persecuted!
From 2013 to 2015, a “Syrian crisis” had evolved because of an Al Qaeda formed entity that morphed
into ISIS and later became the Islamic State. It was a threat to non-Muslims as
stated above. BUT, the majority of those who fled to Europe were NOT SYRIANS!
They were Sunni Muslims from Algeria, from all over. A large percentage of them
came from Northern Africa. I personally witnessed this when I was in Europe in
2017. Another fact about this “economic migration” is that it was suspect as
not being a real “refugee crisis” because the majority of those migrating were
simply were men between the ages of 18 and 40. What many call military age.
There were almost no women and almost no children.
Some of these men later sent for their wives. Some had more than
one wife and some had more than 5 children. The
Daily Mail documented one “Syrian” migrant who made it to the UK and was
receiving £320,000 in benefits every year to provide for his FOUR WIVES and
23 KIDS in 2016. According to the Daily
Mail, the man moved to Germany after being told by the government, they would
only pay for one wife and her children.
At the time of this “crisis” the Islamic
State had issued a statement claiming they were inserting their fighters into Europe
through what they considered foolish acceptance of anyone claiming to be from
Syria.
In 2013, Sweden
started to grant citizenship to anyone making the claim they were from Syria.
No questions asked!
Since this “crisis” happened, an endless stream of Muslim migrants
from the Middle East, North Africa and Asia has throttled Europe, chocking it
financially bringing each its countries into what seems unmeasured debt.
There never seems a day now, when there is not a news story that
does not include a Muslim migrant crime or some act of terrorism expressing
their love of Shariah above the laws of Western civilization.
When will Europe begin to protect its own? When will its natives and their culture be important? Or will they simply cease to exist swallowed up under the rule of Islam taken by invasion of an enemy they refused to understand.
Paul
Sutliff is a federally recognized expert on Civilization Jihad in the United
States. His blog can be found at http://paulsutliff.blogspot.com. You
can request him as a speaker at http://paulsutliff.com. Paul’s books
are on Amazon.
To support Paul please give here: https://www.givesendgo.com/GX8Q
Please support my work by giving through PayPal or by sending a check to Paul Sutliff, PO Box 12846, 4455 Lake Avenue, Rochester, NY 14612.
No comments:
Post a Comment