Civilization Jihad is the result of
two actions. One of them is the secret Islamic doctrine of Hijra a word that
simply means migration. This word goes back to what Islam calls the beginning
the 0 date. The first hijrah the day Muhammad left Mecca. This is an all
important concept counter-terrorism experts around the world are waking up to
thanks to men like Thomas Quiggin and many other great patriots in Canada and
the USA like Bill Warner.
The hijrah is a migration for the
purpose of jihad. The first migration was done to build up and return to
destroy Mecca. We know this because the Muslims wrote about discovering
Muhammad’s military alliances against Mecca. It is why they sought to kill him
the night he fled.
Hijra---its what has happened in
Europe and is continuing to happen. Mostly Military aged men left Muslim
countries and went to European ones not for better economics. Erdogan the
President of Turkey threatened to direct the hijrah at Hungary if they do not
loosen their border control this month.That is a confirmation that the hijrah I have been writing about for two
years is a very real thing indeed.
Why are these people coming? Liberals
claim they are refugees. How is it that? Yes they lived in an area of war. But
they left rather than fight. Were they fleeing ISIS? NO! These people want
sharia? They are not fleeing anything. They have been and are pursuing what
they claim is jizya or Non-Muslims providing for them, Jizya according to
sharia and Islamic histories is a tax on non-Muslims that allowed them to live
another year. Today in Europe they claim welfare is Jizya.
In 2016 Canada took in 40,000 people who
were granted refugee status and who claimed to be Syrians. Sadly, the Globe and Mail went so far as to
show a picture of a Syrian Passport in 2016, while making sure they didn’t
report what the BBC and other news sourced had been reporting on for a year.
That Syrian passports were being sold by ISIS and others. Your major media
outlets are no better than ours in the USA. If the truth won’t fit their message
they hide the truth. That resulted in Canada taking 25,000 people of
questionable origin in 2016.
Statistics for 2017 were not available. For some reason the
Canadian government site stats stop at January 2017. I have to wonder why.
These people did not fear persecution because they are Muslim. They are Sunni Muslims
and agreed with Sharia.
So lets think about what they are bringing here to Canada.
Lets look at what they want In 2011 CNews reported that:
“a large number of Muslims living in Canada will not disown Al-Qaida.” The study, conducted by the MacDonald
Laurier Institute, found 65% of Muslims questioned said they would “repudiate
absolutely” the terrorist organization, while 35% would not do so.
“From a
security perspective, it is difficult to know if a 65% rate of repudiation (of
Al-Qaida) is re-assuring or a 35% failure to repudiate troubling,” wrote study
authors Christian Leuprecht, associate professor of the Royal Military College
of Canada and Conrad Winn, Carleton University professor and president of
COMPAS, a public opinion research firm.
“The most radical
political views tended to be expressed by relatively secular people, often
equipped with higher education in the social sciences, while devout Muslims
were sometimes the most articulate advocates for Canada and democracy.”
According to the Ottawa based think tank, only
a small minority of Muslim newcomers to Canada reject Hamas, Hezbollah, or the
Iranian regime.
The survey, which was released Tuesday, found 62% wanted some form
of Shariah law in Canada, 15% of them saying it should be mandatory for all
Muslims.
The report also states support
for extremism is just as high among Muslims born in Canada, or other Western
countries, as it is among those hailing from oppressive dictatorships.
Knowing this information, Canada took 40,000 in 2016 who have
lived under Sharia.
Keep in mind this what they want you not just them !
I have said this hijra comes before a Jihad. Many of you know
Jihad is war against non-Muslims. But do you know this war is not necessarily hot!
There are 3 levels of
jihad
Heart Jihad. Every
Muslim must hold this anger and hatred of non-Muslims in their heart.
Word-Jihad---Muslims
may engage in Da’Wa, Islamization of knowledge (changing things like history so
it is ok for Muslims. They can engage in politics in an attempt to destroy the
government from within. They can engage in debates, lying and more. Just the
type of person you want in the RCMP right?
Tom Quiggin and crew
discoveredthat the Canadian people have
been sending at least $1.5 million to Islamic Relief. A Muslim Brotherhood
Charity a good friend of Hamas
Finally there is Action
or what some call Hot Jihad. This past September in Edmunton Canadian
A
man drove into a policemanand tried to
stab him and others.
Introduction
This article comes from a paper I wrote as part of my studies at Henley-Putnam University. Because of today's attack in Toronto, Canada, I am publishing parts of the paper here in hopes law enforcement and others will make use of it.
1.Islamic
Speeches that can be deemed contributory towards an attack
MEMRI.org
posted a video and transcript 6473 of a February 2, 2018 sermon given by Imam
Mohamed Moussa gave a sermon at the North Hudson Islamic Center in New Jersey that
called on Islamic teachers to be mindful of what they say in sermons and
schools that could be deemed incitement to violence[1]. According to his
biography on the Graduate Theological Foundation Mohamad Moussa is the
President of the Tri-State Imams Council, and is the Secretary General of
Manara Institute. The importance of this call by Dr. Mohamad Moussa, is that it
is a public recognition that a problem exists in mosques across the United
States of Imams using rhetoric that can be deemed as inciting to violence. Dr.
Mohamad Moussa is not alone in his recognition of this. MEMRI published a video
and transcript in 2015 ofImam Tareq
Yousef Al-Masri who addressed the most recent terror attack in Paris as he
spoke in the Brooklyn Oulel-Albab Mosque on January
9th of 2015. In this sermon Yousef states:
Let us admit, without lying to ourselves, that we, the Muslims, are
time bombs. When I say “we, the Muslims,” I do not mean every single Muslim,
but Muslims of the religious sector are time bombs. When a sinner repents, the
first thing he does is make a bomb. He blows it up and kills people. We must
admit this. We cannot become immune if we do not admit this.[2]
While Yousef was not inciting
violence he was recognizing that it does exist in mosques around the world
including in the USA. Further on in the sermon, Yousef recognized who he
believed were the scholars behind the violent rhetoric being spouted in
mosques. This was an attempt to place a finger of blame against certain Islamic
scholars while recognizing that a problem exists that needs to be addressed.
2.Terrorist
Propaganda of Vehicle Attacks
Dr. Ahmet S. Yayla (2017) wrote of
the Islamic State’s “Lone Wolf’s Handbook” and its possibility for cultivating
terrorist actions within the USA. Dr. Yayla shared that the fourth chapter of
this handbook was entitled “The Ultimate Human Lawn Mower.” Yayla then reminded
the reader that ISIS had released a music video on the use of vehicles to kill
in January of 2016. Yayla noted that this chapter advised the following:
a. To
get a large 4X4 truck and to weld knife-like metal blades on bumpers and around
headlights to increase the causalities.
b.Choose
the most crowded places and drive over people as fast as possible to exact the
most damage.
c.Drivers
are not to stop after the first hit and to keep driving over as many victims as
possible.
d.Choose
the routes appropriately to ensure that there would be many other victims after
the initial hit.
e.These
kinds of attacks should be considered as suicide missions.
f.Driver assassins are advised to have
weapons if possible and fight back until the very end.
Of special note here is the
recommendation to acquire a larger vehicle to inflict maximum damage. Notable
here is that this would likely require actors to rent vehicles. In Western
society, a truck with knives protruding would likely be a target of law
enforcement before any damage could be inflicted, this may account for a lack
of reports of such vehicles in terror attacks.
a.Historical
Usage of Vehicle Attacks
When
I originally was working on this article as a paper for Henley-Putnam
University, an attack occurred in Germany. O'Donoghue (2018, April 07) wrote in the Daily
Star that in Münster a vehicle attack was carried out resulting in the immediate
death of three persons and the injuries of at least 30 others.
O’Donoghue notes with as little information that she has at present, that the
attack seemed to have similarities with an attack in Berlin in December of 2016
in which 12 people were killed and 48 others were injured. Traynor and Hickson
(2016) described this as the attack on the Berlin Christmas Market. This attack
utilized a stolen lorry. A lorry being a commercial type truck used to
transport goods.
Helsel
(2016, August 4) wrote of a vehicle attack
in France on Bastille Day, July 14. The attack claimed the lives of 85 people.
The terrorist was killed. In this incident investigations revealed what that
the terrorist selected his route than did what was called test runs in
preparation.
Prokupecz, Levenson, and
Gingras, B. (2017, November 06) wrote of a truck attack in New York City on
October 31, 2017, which claimed the lives of 6 people with 11 being injured
before the terrorist was shot but not killed. The truck was rented and a note
was found near the truck giving ISIS credit for the attack.
Counter-Extremism Project (2018,
March 16) recognized that there
has been a series of vehicular terrorist related attacks documenting 36 cases
since 2006, “collectively resulting in the deaths of at least 196 people and
the injury of at least 1,050 others”[4].
Add in the statistics for this week and the number dead exceeds 200 while the
number injured rises close to 1,100.
Counter-Extremism Project (CEP), documents individual terror acts. Noting the
country of origin of the actors which never appears to be from within the
country where the attack takes place. CEP notes that in some cases such as the
attack at the Glasgow Airport on June 30, 2007 that vehicular mass was not
enough and actors placed propane canisters for an intended maximum effect. This
action has been seen multiple times, some of them in failed attempts, some of
them seen in accidental explosions such as are described by Birnbaum,
Booth, and Branigin (2017, August 17) after the Barcelona truck attack in June
2017.
The FBIsaw truck attacks becoming a serious concern
by 2010 and published “Use of Vehicle
Ramming Tactics” (2010, December 13). Of special note are the indicators of a possible terror actor provided in this
release. The FBI indicators are tempered with the very real possibility that “a
ramming attack can be conducted with little to no warning”[5].
However, they indicators of a possible actor are only present whenone or multiple indicators are given. Among
the indicators shown are:
·“Unusual
modifications to commercial motor vehicles, heavy equipment, passenger cars,
and sports utility vehicles (SUVs), such as homemade attempts to reinforce the
front of the vehicle with metal plates.
·The purchase,
rental, or theft of large or heavy-duty vehicles or equipment, such as SUVs,
trucks, or commercial motor vehicles, if accompanied by typical indicators such
as nervousness during the purchase, paying in cash, or lack of familiarity with
the vehicle’s operations.
·Commercial motor
vehicles or heavy equipment being operated erratically, at unusual times, or in
unusual locations, particularly in heavy pedestrian areas.
·Attempts to
infiltrate closed areas where traffic usually moves, but where crowds are
gathered, such as for street festivals or farmers’ markets.
·A vehicle operator’s apparent unfamiliarity
with commercial motor vehicle or heavy equipment operation (unable to back up;
trouble with shifting; poor lane tracking; unfamiliarity with basic vehicle
mechanics such as air brake operations, slack adjusters, fifth wheel
operations, Jake brakes, engine type, or location of fire extinguishers and
other emergency equipment)”.[6]
Of interest is the fourth indicator which speaks of
observations of a vehicle in operation at unusual locations particularly heavy
pedestrian zones. This behavior has been discovered after reviewing truck terror
attacks that were committed. Celona,
Fenton and Fears (2017, November 01) revealed that in the case of the New York City truck attack on October
31, 2017, security camera coverage revealed what could have been a test run and
may have been multiple test runs.
3.Why are Vehicle Attacks happening more often?
Vehicle attacks are more likely to
occur because:
·No
affiliation with a terror group is required.
·No
specialized training is needed.
·Planning
can be brief.
·Trucks and Vans are easy to rent or steal.
·Little
to no financial investment required.
·Propaganda
from the Islamic State and Al Qaeda encourage such acts.
·No
collaboration or consulting is required to achieve the terror attack.
·Almost
impossible for law enforcement to detect and prevent.
·Death
while committing the act requires no jail time.
While it is stated that it is
almost impossible to detect, humans are communicative by nature. They write
notes to themselves, talk to others and share what is on their mind. It is
still possible that somehow, something could be known about a possible vehicle attack. Counterterrorism experts have a near impossible task to prevent all
such acts.
