The New York Post wrote an article on February 9th that clearly shows the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, carefully choosing words for the purpose of creating misinformation for the media to share with their readers and viewers regarding their actions against President Trump's Executive Order. According to that article the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stated:
“The Government has pointed to no evidence that an alien of the countries named in the Order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States,” the three-member panel wrote."The terminology "perpetrated a terrorist attack" explicitly excludes all actions prevented or attempted that did not result in a terror attack. Why is this important? There are at least 38 terrorists who were killed or arrested as they worked to be supportive of the Islamic State AND who were also classified as immigrants/refugees at one time. In addition, there are at least 6 persons who were killed or arrested for attempting an act of terror who were second generation Americans refugees. I filed this information in a federally filed affidavit in September 2016 as an Expert Witness. You will notice people from countries other than the seven countries listed in Trump's ban.
All the information in the graphs below originated in the Threat Knowledge Group last accessed in September 2016, whose site was disabled recently with President Trump's appointment of Sebastian Gorka, with the exception of the information in the last column which I found. Actual sources for the information cited in the last column is provided in my Affidavit.
To tell the truth, the WHOLE truth, so help me God.
ReplyDeleteUseful article. Thie reflects a long-standing bias in the mainstream, that planned and/or attempted terror attacks are not to be counted in our overall threat assessment. In my view a planned and/or attempted terror attack should be given the same weight as successful terror attacks on every level.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
Delete