 |
Screen Capture from:
http://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=97
|
Today
thousands of Muslims are answering a call to immigrate to non-Muslim lands.
According to the Department of Homeland Security, of the 70,000 refugees
granted asylum in the USA in 2013 “the leading countries of nationality for
refugee admissions were Iraq (28 percent), Burma (23 percent), Bhutan (13
percent), and Somalia (11 percent). Seventy-five percent [75%] of refugee
admissions in 2013 were from these four countries” (Martin
& Yankay, 2014). If we accept that the vast majority of those living in
these countries are Muslim, then 70% of 70,000 translates into 49,000 Muslims
migrated to America in 2013.
President
Obama brought in 84,995 refugees in for the Fiscal Year 2016, of which four of
the top five countries are Syria, Iraq, Burma and, Somalia all are
predominantly Muslims.[1]
For the fiscal year 2017 President Obama boosted the Refugee Resettlement
Program for a 57% increase.[2] Ann
Corcoran of the Refugee Resettlement Watch noted that 98% of the Syrian
refugees in the first few months of the fiscal year 2017, were Muslim.[3]
This begs the question as to how they are qualifying as refugees since the
definition of Refugee includes the requirement of being persecuted.
This
says nothing of the massive Islamic migration into Europe. Millions of Islamic
migrants are entering Europe from Northern Africa to Afghanistan. Some
countries like Denmark and Sweden are now concerned that their own native
population will be outnumbered in as little as 20 years. Why is this happening?
Isn’t it Haram (forbidden) for a Muslim to move to a non-Muslim land?
Islam Q and A recently answered: Can Muslims settle in kaafir countries
for the sake of a better life?[4] Part of the answer stated that:
In the Sunnah, the Prophet (PBUH) said: “I
disown every Muslim who settles among the mushrikeen” [non-Muslims]. (Narrated
by Abu Dawood, 2645; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.)[5]
According to this manner of
thought living in Dar al-Harb is not only wrong for Muslims it was not
acceptable to live in non-Islamic communities in Muslim lands, according to
their prophet. However, the author of this document does make an exception.
Rather we should say that
each Muslim has his own unique set of circumstances and his own ruling that
applies to him, and each person is accountable for himself. If he is able to
practise his religion in the Muslim country in which he lives more than he can
in a kaafir country, then it is not permissible for him to settle in a kaafir
country.
But
if it is the other way round, then it is permissible for him to settle in a
kaafir country, subject to the condition that he is confident that he can
resist the desires and temptations to be found there by taking the
precautionary measures prescribed in sharee’ah.
Zakariya al-Ansaari
al-Shaafa’i said in his book Asna al-Mataalib (4/207):
It is obligatory to migrate from the kaafir
lands to the Muslim lands for those who are able to do that, if they are unable
to practise their religion openly.”[6]
So
why are Muslims coming to non-Muslim countries, what they call Dar al-Harb if
it is forbidden? Is this merely a smoke screen? Are these very words quoted
above only for a select few? It makes little sense that they could not practice
what they believe in an Islamic country. Or is this a screening out policy? A
doctrinal statement that insists Muslims not strong in their faith must stay in
an Islamic country. What then of those who hold their Islamic faith with
strength?
Keep in mind that Muslims
practice taqiyyah, lying to protect their faith. If they think it is not
advantageous to the spreading of Islam, they will lie or obfuscate the truth.
Since we cannot trust a Muslim to tell the truth on al-hijrah, we must rely on
what the Islamic scriptures state.
According to Hadith no.
2863 Kitab al Amthael reported by Timri, also reported by Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbel
as Hadith no 17344 Mohammad said:
I charge you five of what
Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to
wage jihad for the sake Allah.
According to this wording
it is implied that migration for the purpose of jihad is not only Ok, it is
commissioned by the prophet of Islam. But is this the only citation of such a
statement?
·
Sura 2:218 “Surely those who believed and those
who emigrated and performed jihad.”
·
Sura 8:72 “Surely those who believed and those
who emigrated and performed jihad with their money and their lives for the sake
Allah, and those who gave asylum…”
·
Sura 8:74 “And those who believed and emigrated
and performed jihad for the sake of Allah, and those who gave asylum and help
[gave you victory], those are the true believers, they will receive forgiveness
and generous provisions.
·
Sura 8:75 ““And those who believed afterward and
emigrated and performed jihad with you, so those are of you.
Some
of the Hadiths appear to contradict each other. In one record it appears that
Muhammad had no further intentions to migrate after taking Mecca:
'A'isha reported that
the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was asked about
migration, whereupon he said: There is no migration after the Conquest (of
Mecca), but Jihad and sincere intention. When you are asked to set out (for the
cause of Islam), you should set out, (Sahih Muslim 1864, Book 20, Hadith 4599)
Notice the mention of jihad. Aisha’s comment here implies
that Muslims MUST set out (migrate) for the purpose of jihad only. This agrees
with:
Narrated Mu'awiyah: I
heard the Messenger of Allah say: Migration will not end until repentance ends,
and repentance will not end until the sun rises in the west. (Sunan Abi Dawud 2479, Book 14, Hadith
2473)
Clearly the meaning of “until repentance ends” means when
all have turned to Allah. Migration it seems then is for the purpose of jihad
alone.
As you can see the Hadiths
and the Koran provides several examples that the purpose of migration
(al-Hijrah) is to accomplish jihad. Shouldn’t Western governments be aware of
this? Why aren’t they? The US government spends hundreds of millions of dollars
researching “violent extremism” trying to determine why some persons become
terrorists. They refuse to identify the enemy. Doing this would mean
Universities would not receive millions in research funding and using the
knowledge that had been provided and taught at the Pentagon prior to Barak
Obama becoming President of the United States.
So what does history tell
us? If historians start with the koranic verses at the beginning of this
chapter it is clear that migration (hijrah) is an Islamic doctrine and can be a
requirement placed upon Muslims in certain areas.
Muhammad Khalid Masud wrote
“The obligation to migrate: the doctrine of hijra in Islamic law” which is a
chapter in Muslim Travellers edited by Dale Eickelman and James
Piscatori in 1990. Masud states:
From the Qur’anic texts the following
significant points about hijra can be inferred: (1) It was an obligation
of physical movement towards self-definition in the nascent Muslim society; (2)
hijra was closely associated with jihad; and (3) hijra established
a bond of relationship among Muslims, particularly with the ansar.[7]
Masud’s point on hijra
being closely associated with jihad has great significance because what
is defined today as Islamic terrorism is often classified as Islamic jihad
(holy war) against non-Muslims. Masud did share that there were differing
opinions by scholar on whether hijra remained obligatory and shared those who do
not consider it obligatory, believed that after the death of their prophet
Muhammad hijra ended. But according to Masud, many scholars considered
it an important and relevant teaching.
Abu Sulayman Hamid b. Muhammad Khattabi al-Busti
(AD 931-96/9), a scholar of hadith, … argued that hijra was
actually meant to support and strengthen dar al-Islam in its nascent
days. After the conquests dar al-Islam was so strong and established
that migration was no longer required. The hijra would be required again
only and whenever the conditions so demanded (Ibn Hajar 1959; vi, 378)[8]
Masud uses a quick
historical examination of the time period of the first few Caliphs to look at
the truth of this matter. Masud notes that in the cases of opposing Muslim
groups (631-632 AD) justified their war, “most often the ruling group in the
centre - in terms of jihad. It
was therefore necessary to strengthen their camp by asking their followers to
migrate from enemy territories.”[9]
Masud provides the example
of the Khawarij who justified their jihad and hijra by stating:
all territories were dar al-kufr until
they were brought into the fold of Islam. A territory could turn again into dar
al-kufr if its rulers denied the sovereignty of Allah, or committed a major
sin, whereby they became kafirs. In these circumstances, hijra
from such a territory and jihad against it become obligatory.[10]
This created reasoning for
one group of Muslims to declare an opposing Muslim group as mushriks
(polytheists), justifying a hijra for the purposes of strengthening
their camp before a jihad. William Hunter recorded such events in his
book The Indian Musulmans in 1872.
But even under President
George W. Bush there was censorship on this topic and a refusal to accept what
Islamic terrorists were telling us is actually part of Islam.
One of the Imams of the Dar
Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, 9.3 miles from Washington, DC was
working for Al-Qaeda, Anwar Awlaki. He left the country knowing he was about to
be taken into custody in 2002. His involvement in terror plots in the United
States including 9/11/2001 and the Fort Hood Massacre are unquestionable. His
video messages to the younger generations of Muslims around the world earned
him a death by Hellfire missile approved by President Obama. In 2010, Awlaki
said this about hijra:
To the Muslims in America I
have this to say:
How can your conscience
allow you to live in peaceful coexistence with a nation that is responsible for
the tyranny and crimes committed against your own brothers and sisters? How can
you have loyalty to a government that is leading the war against Islam and
Muslims?
Hence, my advice to you is
this: you have two choices: either hijra [migration] or jihad. You either leave or you fight.
You leave and live among Musims or you stay behind and fight with your hand,
your wealth and your word. I specifically invite the youth to join our brothers
in the fronts of jihad: Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia.[11]
How can we ignore the
purpose of hijra (Islamic migration) is jihad?
Good men such as (Retired)
Major Stephen Coughlin and Dr. William Bradford were teaching the truth of what
Islam teaches about hijra, jihad and, terror. They were removed from their
posts because the knowledge they were sharing would help protect America! So, today
no education occurs and, no training material exist in the alphabet soup of
defense and national security agencies to protect the American people. This
leaves America defenseless at least until Trump becomes the President! Why?
Careful thought in this
would go back to the first large amount of Muslims coming to America in 1962.
Did they come for the purpose of jihad? This would account for the founders of
the North American Muslim Brotherhood. It would also explain their usage of the
term “civilization jihad” in 1991 when they defined their goals.
It directs the Muslim migrant who came for jihad, on how to pursue that goal.
4-
Understanding the role of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America:
The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist
Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their
work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and
destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its
miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is
eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without
this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not
prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad
and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and
there is no escape from that destiny except for those who choose to slack. But,
would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.[12]
If Muslims coming here
would have the purpose of civilization jihad, you would expect them to do so strategically.
Using something like this:
- Start by infiltrating colleges for the purpose of changing what we teach about Islamic history.
- Move to influencing/controlling what is put in textbooks and taught in public schools.
- Attempt to make American culture conform to sharia in general society.
- Attempt to infiltrate every level of government.
My last book Civilization Jihad and the Myth
of Moderate Islam covers this in depth. You can also find updated articles
since the publishing of the book listing persons in government positions and
federal financing of Islamists on my blog at http://paulsutliff.blogspot.com if you
wish to learn more on this topic. .
-----------
If the American people do not wake up and act
soon, they will cease to be the land of the free and become the land of
submission to Islam. This is sadly more of a possible reality with the current
President Barak Obama and Attorney General Loretta Lynch masking references to
Islam by the terrorist in the Orlando attack on the gay club, to protect
Muslims.[13]
As the history of Muslim migration shows in the
pages that follow, Hijrah before jihad is a long followed doctrine.
Recommended Reading
Recommended Reading
Martin, Daniel C., and
James E. Yankay. "Refugees and Asylees: 2013." Department of Homeland
Security: Office of Immigration Statistics. 2014. Accessed June 27, 2016. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ois_rfa_fr_2013.pdf.
Eickelman, Dale F., and James P.
Piscatori. Muslim Travellers: Pilgrimage, Migration, and the Religious
Imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
Solomon, Sam, and Elias Al
Maqdisi. Modern Day Trojan
Horse: Al-Hijra, the Islamic Doctrine of Immigration: Accepting Freedom or
Imposing Islam? Charlottesville,
VA: ANM Publishers, 2009.
[1] "Fact Sheet: Fiscal
Year 2016 Refugee Admissions." U.S. Department of State. October 04, 2016.
Accessed January 02, 2017.https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/10/262776.htm.
[2] Ibid
[3] Corcoran, Ann. "First
two months of FY2017, 98% of Syrian refugees entering the US are Muslims."
Refugee Resettlement Watch. December 04, 2016. Accessed January 02, 2017. https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2016/12/04/first-two-months-of-fy2017-98-of-syrians-entering-the-us-are-muslims.
[4] Al-Munajjid, Muhammad
Saalih. "Can Muslims Settle in Kaafir Countries for the Sake of a Better
Life? - Islamqa.info." Can Muslims Settle in Kaafir Countries for the Sake
of a Better Life? - Islamqa.info. April 20, 2003. Accessed June 27, 2016. http://islamqa.info/en/13363.
[5]
ibid
[6]
ibid
[7] Eickelman, Dale F., and James P. Piscatori. Muslim
Travellers: Pilgrimage, Migration, and the Religious Imagination. Berkeley: U
of California, 1990, p. 32.
[8]
Ibid p. 33.
[9]
Ibid, p. 34.
[10]
Ibid.
[11]
Cited on page 109, Gorka,
Sebastian. Defeating Jihad: the winnable war. Washington, D.C.: Regnery
Publishing, A Division of Salem Media Group, 2016.
[12]
Akram,
Mohamed. “Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the
Brotherhood in North America” (May 19, 1991). Investigative Project on
Terrorism. Retrieved June 27, 2016. http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf.
[13] "DOJ to Scrub Islam
References from Transcripts of Orlando Terrorist's Calls to Police | Fox
News." Fox News. June 20, 2016. Accessed June 27, 2016. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/20/fbi-to-release-partial-transcript-between-orlando-nightclub-gunman-and-police.html.
There are 50 copies left of
this book. Please use the button below to purchase a copy. Books are $17.00 plus $3 shipping.
|
|
You can listen in to my show Wednesdays at 6:00 pm to 7:30 pm EST. You can find the show through this link http://www.blogtalkradio.com/global-patriot-radio
