On April 22, 2015 Dr. Muhammad Shafiq held a meeting to discuss his latest book and was accompanied by co-editor Dr. Nathan Kollar.
The evening started surprisingly slow and revealed that both Dr. Kollar and Dr. Shafiq were unprepared for the event. Neither brought one thing to share with the audience besides themselves. There was a projector for a professional presentation available as well as an ELMO for sharing hard copy information. As an author I was embarrassed for them as this was a highly unprofessional presentation, I have done numerous book talks and not once did I come so unprepared!
Dr. Kollar stated at the beginning of this meeting that he and Dr. Shafiq had been working on the Hickey Interfaith Center for 15 years at Nazareth College of Rochester.
They talked about the importance of interfaith dialogue and asked why we came to listen to them. I openly stated my name and that I am an author, and was concerned that this was a platform for Civilization Jihad and that I wanted to hear him address the section in his book that claims Jesus led a jihad.
When the began to talk about the scriptures of each religion, Dr. Kollar spoke of the Tanak (the law, the prophets and the writings), what Christians refer to as the Old Testament and when he spoke of the Bible he stated they were written by men. When he referred to the Koran he stated it was given by God. Our local media representative, Shannon Joy of WYSL stopped him and said Christians and Jews believe their scriptures come from God not man. Dr. Kollar apologized stating he did not mean to say otherwise.
It was then that I also contributed, but the Koran as Dr. Shafiq states, was given not by God, but by an angel. I pointed out that these two entities are not the same. Christians and Jews believe their scriptures are inspired by God and were not given by angels. However Islam has quite the different story. This was quickly brushed off as semantics. Dr. Kollar served as an apologist for Islam stating that this is pretty much the same thing.
The other Christian present also pointed out that Dr. Shafiq could not have this discussion in his own home country and likely would be killed for daring to have it, this Christian stated that Islam needs to deal with the violent actions of those who are Muslim in Muslim countries to have a serious discussion in interfaith when including Islam.
Dr. Kollar led the discussion to talking about the importance of dialogue and honesty in the dialogue. That was when I had to speak up. That is what the letter below is all about. Please read this and write to Dr. Daan Braveman about your concerns regarding this matter.
Dear President Braaveman and Board of Trustees:
Last night Dr. Muhammad Shafiq presented at the Brighton
Public Library on his latest book with Dr. Nathan Kollar, professor emeritus of
St. John Fischer College. I went with interest since my last encounter with Dr.
Shafiq proved rather revealing.
Dr. Nathan Kollar talked about the importance of honesty in
interfaith relations. I shared that this is an important point “since in my
last encounter with Dr. Shafiq, I asked what Islam means and he replied peace.”
I continued, “I told Dr. Shafiq to stop lying and tell people what it means in
Arabic” and explained that Dr. Shafiq paused and said “Submission.” I stated
that I have grave concerns when someone who is supposed to be teaching kids
(college age) is lying to people about the religion he is supposed to be
teaching. Dr. Shafiq replied in front of 20 people, “Islam means the same thing
as shalom.” I am no fool. I have a BA in Religion and Philosophy with extensive
training in Hebrew. I also have at my disposal an expert in Arabic who will
also communicate that Dr. Shafiq’s HIGHLY OFFENSIVE equation of submission andshalom is nothing other than a purposeful lie!
Due to the blatant lie of Dr. Muhammad Shafiq of Nazareth
College of Rochester to the public, I have great concerns about what he is
teaching to anyone who is not a Muslim. I understand that lying to non-Muslims
about what they believe is part of their faith, they have a doctrine called
taqiyyah. BUT, when a person who is paid to run an inter-faith center and
teaches young impressionable minds at a college is caught lying about the very
topic he was hired to teach I am concerned.
Can Nazareth College of Rochester knowingly continue a
relationship with a man who openly lies to non-Muslims in public forums about
what Islam teaches? As a NAZ graduate myself, I HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS THAT A
PERSON PRACTICING TAQIYYA IS AFFILIATED WITH NAZARETH!
You should know a member of the Press was there last night
and this is likely to be a discussion on her radio show, especially after both
the presenters talked about the importance of honesty in interfaith
discussions!
When the "Is America safe?" series started its purpose was to answer the question can an average hard working American see symptoms of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in our government? The last article barely touched on what the average citizen can see if they only open their eyes and ears. This article continues that series much of what is cited comes from my book, Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam.
For the purpose of continuity of this series 5 of the 10 Symptoms of Infiltration that an average American with no security clearance should be able to see if our government is infiltrated are listed below. Under each name given symptoms of infiltration will be listed and reasons will be provided for the listing. Because this list includes Assentors of Infiltration, names that were not listed in Part 2 of this series will now be revealed. This list is far from complete and is lengthy for a blog, for this reason there will be a Part 3b of 4 with more Assentors of Inifiltration and Infiltrators listed.
Compliance with Muslim Brotherhood front group demands is something you would expect of persons affiliated with Muslim Brotherhood members. Not something you would expect of the federal government.
Questionable priorities would be apparent. This would be a shift away from making protecting America a priority. Possible evidence may indicate a shift to use weapons and intelligence against our young men and women in uniform.
Questionable Alliances would be formed with known Muslim Brotherhood front groups.
Guests of those who infiltrated would likely be affiliated or known to be associated with the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) in some manner. Visitation logs and guest monitoring should be able to reveal a change of mannerisms towards Islamist persons from less favorable to very friendly.
Attempts would be made to place Islamists in positions that would disable the system from pointing the finger at the ones infiltrating. The best terminology here is non-acceptance of accurate intelligence.
John Brennan,
CIA Director Symptoms of Infiltration 3, 4, 5 and, 7.
When John Brennan was nominated by President Barak Obama for the position of Director of the Central Intelligence Agency in 2012, former FBI agent John Guandolo.[1]
raised a lot of objections as to why Brennan should be considered for this position. Top among them is a concern that he converted to Wahhabi Islam.
John Guandolo noted the following important reasons why John Brennan should not be given the position of DCI.
As the senior advisor to the President of the United States for Counterterrorism, John Brennan maintained close relationships with Islamic organizations in America which operate on behalf of terrorist organizations. These included senior Hamas operatives, such as Nihad Awad of the Hamas entity the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).[2]
Brennan provided leaders of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood access to senior National Security staffs and provided input to U.S. counterterrorism strategies.[3]
Brennan publically supports the Muslim Brotherhood. He has spoken publicly on numerous occasions at Muslim Brotherhood events in his official government capacity.[4]
Brennan was a keynote speaker at a number of conferences and functions applauding the efforts of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).[5]
Mr. Brennan refers to Jerusalem as Al-Quds..[6] This is a Muslim anti-Semitic reference and is an unprofessional thing to say when Israel is an ally of the United States regardless of who the audience is. Excusing this behavior because he was speaking to Muslims increases the allowance of taqiyya- like behaviors.
Infiltration Symptom #s 3 and 7 of John Brennan According to Guandolo, “under John Brennan’s direction, the words Jihad, Caliphate, and Shariah, are not even allowed to be used by government counterterrorism officials. This is POLICY at DHS. This creates an atmosphere inside our government where we can never identify our enemy, which means we can never defeat our enemy.” [7]
John Brennan is the Director of the CIA. If this office has been compromised, as it certainly appears, it is hard to comprehend just how extensive the infiltration of the American government by the Muslim Brotherhood truly is today.
US MILITARY
In September 2012, retired three-star General William Jerry Boykin made a public statement that the Muslim Brotherhood had infiltrated the Pentagon at the highest levels with the highest security clearances.
[8] Since 2012, Admiral Lyons, General Tom McInnery and General Paul Vallely have also stated that our government has been infiltrated at the higher levels. Sadly, these allegation have not receive much publicity outside.
Perhaps the response of the Pentagon is lacking because public information is abundant about past infiltrations of the military by the Muslim Brotherhood, chief amongst these is convicted terrorist, Abdurahman Alamoudi.
Abdurahman Alamoudi, (Convicted Terrorist)
Founder Pentagon Muslim Chaplain Program
Symptoms of Infiltration 3, 4, 5, 6 and, 7.
Abdurahman Alamoudi was one of the founders of the Pentagon’s Muslim Chaplain program. This means that he was in a position to influence who could and could not be a Muslim chaplain in our military. He was the head of the American Muslim Council, a known Muslim Brotherhood entity. In this position he met with presidents. Both President Bill Clinton and President George W. Bush met with Alamoudi and posed for photo-ops for the purpose of promoting Muslims engaging in politics. Alamoudi was caught under President George W. Bush. Would he have been caught under President Obama?
Abdurahman Alamoudi, was a Washington fixture. He had many meetings with both Clintonsin the White House and once joined George W. Bush at a prayer service dedicated to victims of the 9/11 attacks. Alamoudi arranged a Ramadan fast-breaking dinner for congressional leaders. He six times lectured abroad for the State Department and founded an organization to provide Muslim chaplains for the Department of Defense. One of his former AMC employees, Faisal Gill, serves as policy director at the Department of Homeland Security’s intelligence division.
In brief, as the Washington Post describes him, Alamoudi was “a pillar of the local Muslim community.”
Four counts of a prohibited financial transaction with the government of Libya.
Two counts of money laundering.
Money structuring.
Two counts of misuse of Passport.
Unlawful procurement of naturalization.
4 counts of failure to report a foreign bank account.).[9]
This terrorist had infiltrated the highest levels of government. His influence at the time extended to past and present presidents of the United States. He was able to get President Clinton to Perhaps that is why they accepted his offer to plead guilty to only three charges, culminating in a sentence of 23 years with a required supervisory release after the time is served.[10]
Today, the Islamic Society of North America, ISNA, an unindicted co-conspirator in providing funding for Hamas, is now the agency vetting Muslim chaplains to the military. This has been public knowledge since 2011! [11] Isn’t this a conflict of interest or a risk to national security and at worst abetting infiltration of Islamic terrorists into positions of influence?
Hillary Clinton (Assentor of Infiltration)
Presidential Candidate for 2016 Former Secretary of State
Symptoms of Infiltration 3, 4, 5, 6 and, 7
It should be said that there is no evidence that Hillary is Muslim Brotherhood. HOWEVER, her actions while in office in one of the highest positions in the United States government have reasons to be examined as one who has allowed infiltration at the highest levels of the federal government.
In an unusual act of defiance, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton exerted Executive Branch privilege to take away the US Constitution-based House power over budgeting on April 11, 2012, in order to release $147,000,000 to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza. This action was taken in retaliation to a hold being placed on the funds designated by the State Department by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (FL).
Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen
Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen had written to Secretary Clinton barely a little over a week before of her reasons for blocking funding. The Chairwoman’s reasoning deserves to be heard as it exposes a possible Islamist plot to use funding to assist Hamas. Ros-Lehtinen wrote:
I am particularly concerned with the $26.4 million that the Administration seeks to provide for “Gaza Assistance and Recovery.” Just a week after the recent rocket attacks against Israel, the Administration is pressuring Congress to provide resources and funding for Gaza that allows Hamas the flexibility necessary to continue its rule over the area. Programming, like funding, is fungible, and allows Hamas and other extremists to utilize their resources to continue their efforts against the United States and Israel. This is why I am not releasing the holds on funds for this component. [12]
What could be easily overlooked, but is an actual bonus into examining Islamist funding through Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, is Chairwoman Ros-Lehtinen’s important note of censure that followed this concern, where she noted Secretary Clinton had previously made a funding request that could have been an embarrassment for the nation!
A poignant example of how Congressional review and hold process helps ensure that funding and programs are, in fact, advancing US interests and that funds are reaching the intended recipients for the intended purpose, occurred in mid and late 2010 with respect to Libya. As then-Ranking Member, I received a notification that would have provided funds to Qadhafi Development Foundation, a so-called NGO that was run by Qahafi’s children (CN#09 246). I received a separate notification that of proposed Foreign Military Financing to Qadhafi (CN#10 257). I placed informational holds on both. The former was immediately halted upon our making State and USAID aware of the problem. The requested information on the proposed was never provided by State and, ultimately, the Administration had to rescind the notification given the President’s declaration regarding the Qadhafi regime in early 2011 – just months after requesting the Congress approve military aid for Qadhafi.
Had Congress NOT exerted its due diligence and oversight, the Administration would have been complicit in aiding the same Libyan forces that the United States mobilized against only a few months later. [13]
Note that Chairwoman Ros-Lehtinen had previously saved the USA from an embarrassing action by the State Department. Her heroic refusal of funding should go down as an action of checks and balances that saved America from itself. Anyone who remembers President Reagan’s confrontation with Qadhafi (aka Gadaffi) has to wonder what President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were thinking when they authorized military aid to Qadhafi.
Hillary’s recent refusal to hand over records from the email account she used while in office, exclusive of those she personally selected prior to destroying federal records make it possible to view the action as protecting her past actions of assenting to civilization jihad.
The missing emails regarding Benghazi ,hints that rumors in the Spring and summer of 2012 that a political official would be kidnapped for the purpose of handing over the blind sheik to the Muslim Brotherhood, were circulating in conservative circles months before the attack on Benghazi. could have substantiated her involvement. What we do know now on this topictoday is that the attack on Benghazi was likely a botched kidnapping attempt. Was Hillary intimately involved in this? When we get a new administration and the infiltrators and assentors are removed we may learn the truth.
Make no mistake about it, the State Department has been infiltrated on so many levels, that much of
the Islamist agenda is currently being carried out by several sublevel federal agencies.
Huma Abedin,
Deputy Chief of Staff to Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Symptoms of Infiltration 3, 4, 5, 6 and, 7
Huma Abedin is the most prominent case of Muslim Brotherhood influence that the major media outlets dared to touch—defensively. Congresswoman Michelle Bachman and five other Congressional representatives dared to question how she possibly passed a security clearance. Considering, the numerous connections she had to outside groups that could be deemed hostile to America, including several connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Andrew McCarthy wrote extensively about the connections that likely seemed to violate every security protocol in place to protect both secrets and the American people. Yet, when these security violations were exposed, “there was great gnashing of teeth from both Democrats and the Brotherhood’s growing squad of Republican cheerleaders.” [14]
No better example of bipartisan actions to cover up a security breach exists today, than what Senator McCain and the media did to help hide Huma Abedin’s connections to the Muslim Brotherhood from the American people. Senator McCain made public statements in support of Abedin and the media instead of doing an investigation, ran with McCain’s version of the story.
Huma Abedin was the editor of Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs for 12 years, which was financed by Abdullah Omar Naseef – a wealthy Saudi financier of al-Qaeda and Brotherhood eminence. This time period coordinates with her starting an internship with the Clinton White House in 1996 until a little before she joined the US State Department in 2009.
During the time she served as an intern at the White House, she served on the Executive Board of the Muslim Student Association at George Washington University. The FBI knew of the MSA’s connection to the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1980s so this was a clear security breach in 1996. McCarthy notes that the GWU’s MSA has an interesting history that can NOT be ignored:
In 2001, its spiritual guide was … Anwar al-Awlaki, the al-Qaeda operative who was then ministering to some of the eventual 9/11 suicide-hijackers. Awlaki himself had led the MSA chapter at Colorado State University in the early nineties.[15]
Yet, somehow Huma Abedin received a security clearance allowing her access to top level US State Department material. To her credit, Secretary Clinton eventually did have Huma Abedin quietly disappear for a time. But, it was unknown if she was still being paid at the time. It may be wise to watch Mrs. Clinton’s inner circle of her Presidential campaign, Hillary 2016 to see if Huma Abedin reappears.
Eric Holder, (Assentor of Infiltration)
US Attorney General
Symptoms of Infiltration 3, 6 and, 7
Eric Holder demonstrated in 2011 that he did not have similar fortitude to that which the RCMP demonstrated when they turned down a proposed pamphlet by the Canadian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. He chose to align himself with Muslim Brotherhood petitioning groups and representatives in government that received their funding.
Muslim Brotherhood representatives from MPAC and CAIR issued public statements about the training materials the FBI was using contacting erroneous material. Amongst those complaining is Salam al-Marayati wrote broad statements complaining about the materials but giving no examples! Beyond citing Wired! Magazine’s citation of presentations they believed were offensive.
Interestingly, not one comment was given about the accuracy of the materials. An attempt is made to belittle one presentation on Civilization Jihad that made the claim that: “The goal of that war: 'Replacement of American Judeo-Christian and Western liberal social, political and religious foundations by Islam.’”.[16]
This term Civilization jihad was revealed to Americans by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Explanatory Memorandum:
4- Understanding the role of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America:
The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who choose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal. [Emphasis Added]
Wired magazine had the opportunity to utilize that same research. They chose instead to assist an enemy of the country by painting innocence where documentation reveals something else entirely.
However, the word of Muslim Brotherhood’s representatives from CAIR and ISNA are enough for US Attorney General Eric Holder to obey and submit, despite the fact US Attorney General Eric Holder KNEW ABOUT THE DECLARATION OF CIVILIZATION JIHAD! IT WAS HIS DUTY TO KNOW THIS!
Holder ordered training materials expunged from the FBI and DOJ of important relevant materials that would have assisted in professional counterterrorism training and possibly enabled the media to act responsibly when they too were made aware of information.
Asma Mirza (OMB)
Symptoms of Infiltration 5, 6 and, 7.
At first glance this name will not strike chords of memory unless you have been a part researching the Muslim Brotherhood for a while. Asma is the daughter of Yacob Mirza, a prominent member of the North American Muslim Brotherhood and an officer of the International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Asma Mirza started visiting the White House in 2010 shortly after she became a member of ISNA’s “Board of Directors” at the age of 26. Interestingly, at that young age she also landed a job at the White House. These two things by themselves may not have been of interest. but how many 26 year olds are you aware of as being so important that they are becoming Board Members of national organizations and being hired to work at the White House?
President Obama has her mentioned on a few memos and as a contributor to the 2016 Budget. ISNA is the post college group the members of the Muslim Student Association (MSA) enter to continue their work with the Muslim Brotherhood. MSA created ISNA when their Muslim Brotherhood leadership became too old to easily fit in within the college community.
Asma is listed on the White House Visitor Logs over 950 times since her first visit in 2010. When the Budget crisis became to severe and Sequestration occurred, Obama ordered all tours of the White House ended – unless you were a member or affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. Because Asma gave tours of the White House to several Muslims during that time. According to her LinkedIn Profile she is a "Performance Manager" for OMB.
What exactly she is doing today as a federal employee is not revealed through a search of the employee salary database of the White House for any one of the years she has been holding meetings at White House. This is a violation of federal law. Why would the White House hide Asma Mirza's salary while listing her as someone to confer with over budgeting issues? This is an important question! Asma has an Office of Management and Budget Email address, but her salary can not be found?
If the White House is hiding the salary of Asma Mirza, WHAT ARE ELSE ARE THEY HIDING?
CONCLUSION This short list of individuals who are former and/or current employees for the Obama administration is by no means complete. This writer does not have access to the White House. I don't even rate a tour because I am not a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. White House tours have been stopped since the sequestration.
Again, if I an average American can see these things. WHY is the FBI, CIA, Secret Service and our representatives in both the Senate and the House doing nothing? How is it possible that an average citizen can see these things and those who have the ability to take corrective actions cannot see them? Is the lack of action based solely on infiltration? I think not!
[All pictures are from WikiCommons with the exception of Asma Mirza's picture which was found on a MSA site.]
(Obfuscation vs. poorly educated President, you choose)
In Part 1 of the “Are We Safe?” series,
I proposed 10 things the average man should be able to see if our government
has been infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood. This theme continues by
examining the first two items the average American should be able to see IF our
government has been infiltrated.
If we are watching for Muslim
Brotherhood infiltration of our government you would expect to see an inordinate
reflection of the population in high government roles. For example if the
US population of Muslims was 3% you would not expect to find 25% of high
governmental positions are filled by Muslims.
So is there an inordinate amount of
Muslims working in the executive branch? To have the exact figures I filled an
FOIA with Equal Employment Opportunity Center (EEOC), which keeps statistics.
What is known is that the following past
and present Obama appointees are Muslims. Note that Huma Abedin is included
because the president would have had to approve her position.
Senior Advisor at the US Agency for International
Development Middle East and Asia Bureaus
Asma Mirza
OMB representative at the White House mentioned on WH Memos as someone staff must confer with regarding their budgets. Miss Mirza holds meetings at the WH but her salary is not listed in violation of federal policy!
President of the United States (Note his usage of personal pronouns in the quotes below in regards to Islam.)
More details will be provided on many of these individuals as the series continues.Many of the persons listed above are discussed in detail my book, Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam. You will also find an examination of the White House Visitor Logs which will be mentioned in a later installment in this series.
We are now up to the second infiltration indicator the average person could see.
Obfuscation of historical facts would be utilized to paint a pretty picture of the Muslim Brotherhood which has a violent history. The more popular terms here is propaganda would be used to recreate the Muslim Brotherhood into an imaginary non-violent hippie type group.
The long history of the violence of the Muslim Brotherhood can be easily
seen through its assassinations, violent action through its Palestinian
Branch aka HAMAS, and the recent history in Egypt which includes an
attack on police.
I have additionally included the following statements by President Obama which are obfuscations of historical fact. In other words, they are attempts at providing misinformation (aka PROPAGANDA) to the American people. For the purpose of directly addressing purposeful obfuscation and demonstrating accuracy in citation, what was said before and/or after the item being declared propaganda is also provided with a direct link to where it was found at WhiteHouse.gov.
As a student of history, I also
know civilization's debt to Islam. It was Islam -- at places like
Al-Azhar -- that carried the light of learning through so many centuries,
paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment. It was
innovation in Muslim communities -- (applause) -- it was innovation in Muslim
communities that developed the order of algebra; our magnetic compass and tools
of navigation; our mastery of pens and printing; our understanding of
how disease spreads and how it can be healed. Islamic culture has given
us majestic arches and soaring spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant
calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history,
Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious
tolerance and racial equality. (Applause.)
I also know that Islam has always
been a part of America's story. The first nation to recognize my country
was Morocco. In
signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second President, John Adams, wrote,
"The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws,
religion or tranquility of Muslims." And since our founding, American
Muslims have enriched the United States.They have fought in our wars,
they have served in our government, they have stood for civil rights, they have
started businesses, they have taught at our universities, they've excelled in
our sports arenas, they've won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and
lit the Olympic Torch. And when the first Muslim American was
recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using
the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers -- Thomas Jefferson --
kept in his personal library.
In regards to his mention of Islam contributing "cherished music," Islamic law, Shariah forbids the playing of musical instruments and the only music allowed is unaccompanied vocal music. This can be found in Reliance of the Traveller (Shariah translated into English):
r40. 1 (Ibn Hajar Haytami;) As for the condemnation of musical instruments, flutes, strings, and the like by the Truthful and Trustworthy (Allah bless him and give him peace), who "does not speak from personal caprice: it is nothing besides a revelation inspired" (Koran 53:3-4), let those who refuse to obey him beware lest calamity strike them, or a painful torment. The Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said;
(1) "Allah Mighty and Majestic sent me as a guidance and mercy to believers and commanded me to do away with musical instruments, flutes, strings, crucifixes, and the affair of the pre-fslamic period of ignorance."
(2) "On the Day of Resurrection, Allah will pour molten lead into the ears of whoever sits listening to a songstress'
Just in case you are unsure as to what Sharia says about vocal music unaccompanied by any musical instruments:
SINGING UNACCOMPANIED BY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS
r40.3 (Ibn Ilajar Haymmi:) As for listening to singing that is not accompanied by instruments.
one should know that singing or listening to singing is offensive except under the circumstances to be mentioned in what follows. Some scholars hold that singing is sunna at weddings and the like, and of our Imams, Ghazaii and 'Izzibn^Abdal-Salam say that it is sunna if it moves one to a noble state of mind that makes one remember the hereafter.
It is clear from this that all poetry which encourages good deeds, wisdom, noble qualities, abstinence from this- worldly things, or similar pious traits such as urging one to obey Allah, follow the sunna, or shun disobedience, is sunna to write, sing, or listen to, as more than one of our Imams have stated is obvious, since using a means to do
good is itself doing good...
Note that Barak Obama just stated he grew up in a Muslim country yet is stating that Islam has made contributions to music. This is obfuscation of historical fact. It is also considered taqiyya, lying to protect the Islamic faith.
"...since our founding, American
Muslims have enriched the United States.They have fought in our wars,
they have served in our government, they have stood for civil rights, they have
started businesses, they have taught at our universities, they've excelled in
our sports arenas, they've won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and
lit the Olympic Torch."
Were there any Muslims here in the 1700s? The historical answer is that if any were here they were sold into slavery and were working on plantations in the South. However, considering that many of the sellers of slaves in Africa were Muslims it is unlikely they sold fellow Muslims as slaves. No historical record exists that verifies that one Muslim was present at the writing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 or at the Constitutional Convention in 1789 that resulted in the Constitution of the United States of America.
Keith Ellison was the first Muslim elected to serve in Congress in 2007. He had served in the state of Minnesota as a representative, but this is all recent history.
Civil Rights? Malcolm X is often listed with Civil Rights activists from the sixties. But even he admits that his understanding of Islam was errant. According to his own words the Nation of Islam is not true Islam. The great Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was known for his amazing fortitude of a nonviolent nature which led to the incredible pinnacle of his "I have a Dream" speech. The Nation of Islam were not nonviolent during this time and were kept separate from the Civil Rights Movement as seen here
So President Obama lied to the Egyptians when he said these things. Was he also lying to Americans when he said these things?
Lets look at the tallest buildings in the USA. Were any Muslims present when the Empire State Building went up? How about the World Trade Center buildings or the Sears tower in Chicago? Again our president obfuscated, in other words, he LIED to promote Islam in America.
Were there any American Muslim Nobel Prize winners? NO.
After all these obfuscations "LIES" about American history from a sitting President shouldn't Americans be concerned? Are we seeing the second sign of infiltration of our government through our Presidents lies about American history? Perhaps this President who has a Harvard education was just poorly educated? You would think his staff would make sure he would not repeat these lies. But he did.
Throughout
our history, Islam has contributed to the character of our country, and Muslim
Americans, and their good works have helped to build our nation -- and we’ve
seen the results. We’ve seen those results in generations of Muslim
immigrants -- farmers and factory workers, helping to lay the railroads and
build our cities. Muslim innovators who helped build some of our highest
skyscrapers and who helped to unlock the secrets of our universe.
Is President Obama the only president to lie about past American history? I can not find one other example. But was the real purpose here to put American history through an Islamic lens to accomplish Islamization of Knowledge? This is something I wrote about that the Muslim Brotherhood is promoting at the International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Watch for the third installment on "Is America Safe?" Items three through five will be expanded on.
