Monday, October 31, 2016

OBFUSCATION ALERT: The Major Media News Outlets and Islamic Migrants

Of late the major media news outlets have done a series of articles on the migrants being displaced from the “Jungle” camp also known as Calais refugee camp. What is interesting is that the “professional reporters” only convey the story from the refugees’ point of view.  

The Associated Press published an article byAlex Turnbull on Oct. 31, 2016 entitled: “Police operation creates tension in Paris migrant camp he quotes one refugee and one charity worker: 

"Every day, I see on TV, on the internet, on Facebook that here there are human rights. Where are the human rights? I'm not seeing any human rights here," said Mirzai. 

Charity worker Houssam El Assimi, of local aid group La Chappelle Debout, held a sign reading "No to police raids against migrants." He said Monday's operation was the 27th in the area in which police sort people based on whether they have papers and the right to seek asylum. 

Turnbull ends his article with a quote from police on how many migrants they have turned out from camps. But his article is missing several key things. Comments from locals and how they felt about the refugee camp. A simple survey on locals and if the refugee camp made them feel less safe would have fit perfectly. What about a report from police on if any crimes were related to the local migrant camp? This also would have been an obvious fit. 

But the simple reason is that the French government and the media have an agreement not to portray anything negative about the refugees or to ever allow a portrayal of what they have in common, they are largely Muslims in love with Sharia…Islamists. There is one more additional element. The vast majority of migrants in France are men of military age without families! I was in France a month ago and witnessed a makeshift soup kitchen in action at a refugee camp in Paris where tents and mattresses and trash seemed in abundance. Below is a brief video of this.  

I had the privilege of meeting with people in the Interior Ministry, where I met one of the leaders of the General Directorate for Aliens in France. This is why I also noticed something else not stated in the Turnbull article. The article states:  

Regional authorities say they have cleared out more than 19,000 migrants from Paris since June 2015. 

What it does not say is of these 19,000 “x” amount were deported. Were any of these people deported? The answer sadly is none. When I met with the head of Immigration to France in the Interior Ministry, he revealed something every French citizen needs to know and likely does not. That the French government may not be able to deport a migrant who does not comply with what the government of France requires. So a migrant can be “eternally on the dole. 

             But Associated Press is not alone in its purposeful obfuscation of “migrant” issues. CNN is a partner a crime. CNN ran an article on Thursday, October 27th entitled, Calais 'Jungle': Unregistered children left in limbo by Laura Smith-Spark, Saskya Vandoorne and Bryony Jones. Interestingly this article also neglects important points in favor of making the government the bad guy and the migrants good guys. First off since this is an American source it calls the migrants “refugees.” This is a contradiction to what the government of France calls them. Why the change in title? It is simply a ploy to gather sympathy for their plight. These people are not running from persecution, which would make them refugees. They are not fleeing war. Although you may think so from reading the articles. The majority of these men are North African. But you would not know that from reading this article.  

               Bell said there had been no violence as yet between police and migrants, but anxiety was growing among the unaccompanied teenagers, many of them from Afghanistan, about what might happen. 

Really Bell? Do you have any stats to prove that? The Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) did a study which was published in May of this year and determined the following: 

  • Of the 6,000 migrants estimated to be living in the Jungle and Jules Ferry Centre, the largest group were found to be from Sudan, at around a third, followed by Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Eritrea and Pakistan. 
  • 95 per cent of respondents were men and the mean age was 25, with half of those questioned having completed secondary or further education. 
  • 25% of those in Calais reporting having experienced violence experienced it in the “Calais jungle”, wheresexual abuse and exploitationhas been reported alongside police brutality. 
  • 61 per cent of asylum seekers were also found to have health problems, mostly developing since their arrival in the Jungle. 

This study did not reveal if it questioned a person’s claims about their country of origin. However, since migrants have been found to be lying about their age. This should have been verified before accepting the countries of origin are counted as valid. 

Also what about those kids taken to the UK on the premise that  2/3rds of the unaccompanied minors screened were found to be lying about their age. The UK Telegraph exposed this as a lie on October 18th! So Why do the CNN personnel not report on this? Claiming to be a minor and not being one should merit an immediate deportation. Simply because it places other minors at risk. So were the people left in Calais actually teens or were they adults? 

Then the one true uniting factor for the vast majority of the migrants is simply missing. Not one major media news source says what it is. Why is that? Are they forbidden from using the terms “Muslim” or “Islamic” as an accurate descriptive word? In Europ  e they use the word “Asian” whenever they mean Muslim in the news media. 

Historically, in areas taken over by Islamic governments, those who refused to convert and were allowed to live were called Dhimmis had to pay a tax, the jizya, and they were forbidden from using Arabic. Are the major media news outlets now Dhimmis? You be the judge! 

If you like my work, please click on the book and make a purchase in order to help me to continue to bring you the truth!

Friday, October 28, 2016

A dose of Hillary Helper for Terrorists

Hillary Clinton (Assentor of Infiltration)
Presidential Candidate for 2016 
Former Secretary of State

It should be said that there is no evidence that Hillary is Muslim Brotherhood. HOWEVER, her actions while in office in one of the highest positions in the United States government have reasons to be examined as one who has allowed infiltration at the highest levels of the federal government.

  In an unusual act of defiance, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton exerted Executive Branch privilege to take away the US Constitution-based House power over budgeting on April 11, 2012, in order to release $147,000,000 to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza. This action was taken in retaliation to a hold being placed on the funds designated by the State Department by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (FL). 

Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen
Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen had written to Secretary Clinton barely a little over a week before of her reasons for blocking funding. The Chairwoman’s reasoning deserves to be heard as it exposes a possible Islamist plot to use funding to assist Hamas. Ros-Lehtinen wrote: 
I am particularly concerned with the $26.4 million that the Administration seeks to provide for “Gaza Assistance and Recovery.” Just a week after the recent rocket attacks against Israel, the Administration is pressuring Congress to provide resources and funding for Gaza that allows Hamas the flexibility necessary to continue its rule over the area. Programming, like funding, is fungible, and allows Hamas and other extremists to utilize their resources to continue their efforts against the United States and Israel. This is why I am not releasing the holds on funds for this component. [12]

What could be easily overlooked, but is an actual bonus into examining Islamist funding through Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, is Chairwoman Ros-Lehtinen’s important note of censure that followed this concern, where she noted Secretary Clinton had previously made a funding request that could have been an embarrassment for the nation!
A poignant example of how Congressional review and hold process helps ensure that funding and programs are, in fact, advancing US interests and that funds are reaching the intended recipients for the intended purpose, occurred in mid and late 2010 with respect to Libya. As then-Ranking Member, I received a notification that would have provided funds to Qadhafi Development Foundation, a so-called NGO that was run by Qahafi’s children (CN#09 246). I received a separate notification that of proposed Foreign Military Financing to Qadhafi (CN#10 257). I placed informational holds on both. The former was immediately halted upon our making State and USAID aware of the problem. The requested information on the proposed was never provided by State and, ultimately, the Administration had to rescind the notification given the President’s declaration regarding the Qadhafi regime in early 2011 – just months after requesting the Congress approve military aid for Qadhafi.
Had Congress NOT exerted its due diligence and oversight, the Administration would have been complicit in aiding the same Libyan forces that the United States mobilized against only a few months later. [13]

Note that Chairwoman Ros-Lehtinen had previously saved the USA from an embarrassing action by the State Department. Her heroic refusal of funding should go down as an action of checks and balances that saved America from itself. Anyone who remembers President Reagan’s confrontation with Qadhafi (aka Gadaffi) has to wonder what President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were thinking when they authorized military aid to Qadhafi.

Hillary’s recent refusal to hand over records from the email account she used while in office, exclusive of those she personally selected prior to destroying federal records make it possible to view the action as protecting her past actions of assenting to civilization jihad. 

The missing emails regarding Benghazi ,hints that rumors in the Spring and summer of 2012 that a political official would be kidnapped for the purpose of handing over the blind sheik to the Muslim Brotherhood, were circulating in conservative circles months before the attack on Benghazi. could have substantiated her involvement. What we do know now on this topictoday is that the attack on Benghazi was likely a botched kidnapping attempt. Was Hillary intimately involved in this? When we get a new administration and the infiltrators and assentors are removed we may learn the truth.

Make no mistake about it, the State Department has been infiltrated on so many levels, that much of
the Islamist agenda is currently being carried out by several sublevel federal agencies.

Huma Abedin,
Deputy Chief of Staff to Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 

Huma Abedin is the most prominent case of Muslim Brotherhood influence that the major media outlets dared to touch—defensively. Congresswoman Michelle Bachman and five other Congressional representatives dared to question how she possibly passed a security clearance. Considering, the numerous connections she had to outside groups that could be deemed hostile to America, including several connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Andrew McCarthy wrote extensively about the connections that likely seemed to violate every security protocol in place to protect both secrets and the American people. Yet, when these security violations were exposed, “there was great gnashing of teeth from both Democrats and the Brotherhood’s growing squad of Republican cheerleaders.” [14] 

No better example of bipartisan actions to cover up a security breach exists today, than what Senator McCain and the media did to help hide Huma Abedin’s connections to the Muslim Brotherhood from the American people. Senator McCain made public statements in support of Abedin and the media instead of doing an investigation, ran with McCain’s version of the story.

Huma Abedin was the editor of Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs for 12 years, which was financed by Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs– a wealthy Saudi financier of al-Qaeda and Brotherhood eminence. This time period coordinates with her starting an internship with the Clinton White House in 1996 until a little before she joined the US State Department in 2009.

During the time she served as an intern at the White House, she served on the Executive Board of the Muslim Student Association at George Washington University. The FBI knew of the MSA’s connection to the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1980s so this was a clear security breach in 1996. McCarthy notes that the GWU’s MSA has an interesting history that can NOT be ignored:
In 2001, its spiritual guide was … Anwar al-Awlaki, the al-Qaeda operative who was then ministering to some of the eventual 9/11 suicide-hijackers. Awlaki himself had led the MSA chapter at Colorado State University in the early nineties. [15]
Yet, somehow Huma Abedin received a security clearance allowing her access to top level US State Department material. To her credit, Secretary Clinton eventually did have Huma Abedin quietly disappear for a time. But, it was unknown if she was still being paid at the time. It may be wise to watch Mrs. Clinton’s inner circle of her Presidential campaign, Hillary 2016 to see if Huma Abedin reappears. 

If you like my work, please click on the book and make a purchase in order to help me to continue to bring you the truth!

Monday, October 3, 2016

European Governments: There are NO Migrant problems here!

France Interior Ministry
Truth sometimes is harder to swallow than fantasy world of belief that there exist no problems. This was for some reason the overwhelming consensus of the government officials we met, with few exceptions in France, Germany and Sweden. 

What happens when a government refuses to acknowledge it has made a bad decision? What happens when the harsh reality exposes that? My observation is that these government officials react by hiding by the problem. 

In Paris, the team of 35 on the Fact Finding Expedition discovered that the France’s Interior Ministry had no difficulty with cleaning up evidence of a problem. When migrants move in they say or do nothing until someone starts to document it. Then in the midst of the night they send in the police and military to clean away the evidence of a tenting area and high traffic mostly young male migrant area, complete with a sanitizing of the area. They follow this up by placing 8 to 10 feet high fences that are able to keep them from refilling the area.  On top of this the official in charge of Migration stated that if a Migrant does not fulfill his half of the contract that all migrants must sign, that France can not deport. The result is that the migrant can not become a citizen, but they can again apply to be a migrant. French citizens are expected to hold jobs. Migrants are not expected to have jobs since they are new to the country.
German Interior Ministry

In Germany, like in France the very concept that a problem exists was not even allowed to be thought of in government officials. Migrant problem? We don’t have a problem. One official went so far as to blame the police for responding poorly and that being the cause of the rape and sexual assaults upon women. This allowance of blame on a group of persons who exist to react to social problems that we call crimes, removes the possibility of addressing the issue! Who was committing the crimes that the police needed to react to? Why was their response needed? Why were they unable or unwilling to respond?  

In Berlin our translator shared another reason to be so accepting of migrant Muslims. He did not like the German people because they were too anti-Semitic for him. His answer was he wanted to change the people! The moment I heard this, the name Hitler sounded like a loud gong in my head. Is this the cause of so many Islamic migrants being allowed into European countries? Is it the cause of the directives of POTUS  Obama? DO they want to change put their people?  

Not long ago one of those in favor of increasing Islamic migration to America called those that opposed her stance “Deplorables.” Yes, I am speaking of Hillary Clinton. This thought of replacing people to get what you want in a vote is a threat to the people of the country no matter where the country is. 

In Sweden, the press works with the Social Democrats to get their message out that there is no problem with massive Islamic migration. The press does its part to call for the removal of those who see this as a threat. I saw this happen while I was in Stockholm, Sweden. Censorship of opinion is a HUGE thing in a country where it is uncultural to ask question! This cultural aspect is one of the first things our translator expressed to us. No where was this better expressed than in a the short You TUBE video I am posting below. 

What does this mean for us here? What is the ultimate lesson I have returned with?  
  1. Canadians and Americans must wake-up and express their concerns loudly or they will be quickly silenced into nothing more than a whisper that others perceive as nothing more than a rumor. Truth can be easily quieted by a government that does not wish to be seen in error. 
  1. Becoming vocal is not enough. We must stand tall politically. To be honest for me this conclusion is too vague and undefined for me at present. But for the present I will say it means  getting into politics ourselves or, doing what we can to become advisers to politicians or, becoming an avid citizen lobbyists.  
  1. Destruction of culture is imminent when two cultures clash. One will simply out populate the other or crush it through a war. Saying nothing about protecting your culture makes you complicit in accepting its doom. 
  1. Fear of appearing oppressive by protecting your country is not a totally bad thing! Who cares you are sounding an alarm. If you keep silent what will exist when there is no longer anyone to sound the alarm? When the freedoms you cherished have been stolen out from under your feet how will your grandchildren ever understand what you had? When you attempt to express what is not politically correct and the result is jail or a fine, will you finally say I should have listened and spoke out? 

WAKE UP! The war is here! Civilization Jihad is real!

If you like my work, please click on the book and make a purchase in order to help me to continue to bring you the truth!